<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 回溯「沙田價值」—超越中環價值的歷史地理觀</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.horace.org/blog/2007/08/19/%e5%89%aa%e5%a0%b1%ef%b9%95-%e5%9b%9e%e6%ba%af%e3%80%8c%e6%b2%99%e7%94%b0%e5%83%b9%e5%80%bc%e3%80%8d%e2%80%94%e8%b6%85%e8%b6%8a%e4%b8%ad%e7%92%b0%e5%83%b9%e5%80%bc%e7%9a%84%e6%ad%b7%e5%8f%b2%e5%9c%b0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.horace.org/blog/2007/08/19/%e5%89%aa%e5%a0%b1%ef%b9%95-%e5%9b%9e%e6%ba%af%e3%80%8c%e6%b2%99%e7%94%b0%e5%83%b9%e5%80%bc%e3%80%8d%e2%80%94%e8%b6%85%e8%b6%8a%e4%b8%ad%e7%92%b0%e5%83%b9%e5%80%bc%e7%9a%84%e6%ad%b7%e5%8f%b2%e5%9c%b0/</link>
	<description>Serious about the frivolous, frivolous about the serious</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:57:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: hevangel</title>
		<link>http://www.horace.org/blog/2007/08/19/%e5%89%aa%e5%a0%b1%ef%b9%95-%e5%9b%9e%e6%ba%af%e3%80%8c%e6%b2%99%e7%94%b0%e5%83%b9%e5%80%bc%e3%80%8d%e2%80%94%e8%b6%85%e8%b6%8a%e4%b8%ad%e7%92%b0%e5%83%b9%e5%80%bc%e7%9a%84%e6%ad%b7%e5%8f%b2%e5%9c%b0/#comment-12864</link>
		<dc:creator>hevangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 02:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horace.org/blog/2007/08/19/%e5%89%aa%e5%a0%b1%ef%b9%95-%e5%9b%9e%e6%ba%af%e3%80%8c%e6%b2%99%e7%94%b0%e5%83%b9%e5%80%bc%e3%80%8d%e2%80%94%e8%b6%85%e8%b6%8a%e4%b8%ad%e7%92%b0%e5%83%b9%e5%80%bc%e7%9a%84%e6%ad%b7%e5%8f%b2%e5%9c%b0/#comment-12864</guid>
		<description>任何建制是必然地霸權﹐沒有權力又如何是建制﹖霸不霸只是程度上的分別。若果用分板哲學來說﹐建制霸權一詞不過是內容空廢的標簽罷了。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>任何建制是必然地霸權﹐沒有權力又如何是建制﹖霸不霸只是程度上的分別。若果用分板哲學來說﹐建制霸權一詞不過是內容空廢的標簽罷了。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pqr</title>
		<link>http://www.horace.org/blog/2007/08/19/%e5%89%aa%e5%a0%b1%ef%b9%95-%e5%9b%9e%e6%ba%af%e3%80%8c%e6%b2%99%e7%94%b0%e5%83%b9%e5%80%bc%e3%80%8d%e2%80%94%e8%b6%85%e8%b6%8a%e4%b8%ad%e7%92%b0%e5%83%b9%e5%80%bc%e7%9a%84%e6%ad%b7%e5%8f%b2%e5%9c%b0/#comment-12856</link>
		<dc:creator>pqr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horace.org/blog/2007/08/19/%e5%89%aa%e5%a0%b1%ef%b9%95-%e5%9b%9e%e6%ba%af%e3%80%8c%e6%b2%99%e7%94%b0%e5%83%b9%e5%80%bc%e3%80%8d%e2%80%94%e8%b6%85%e8%b6%8a%e4%b8%ad%e7%92%b0%e5%83%b9%e5%80%bc%e7%9a%84%e6%ad%b7%e5%8f%b2%e5%9c%b0/#comment-12856</guid>
		<description>成日話建制霸權, 其實佢地想要個咩社會?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>成日話建制霸權, 其實佢地想要個咩社會?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

