<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 兩周一聚：傳統與傳統智慧</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/</link>
	<description>Serious about the frivolous, frivolous about the serious</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:57:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: chilli mom</title>
		<link>http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/#comment-67428</link>
		<dc:creator>chilli mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/#comment-67428</guid>
		<description>超攪笑，你是男校生？
我以前聽過一個我覺得超恐佈遊戲處罰，叫「肥水不流別人田」，意即把受罰人個頭塞入馬桶再拉水。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>超攪笑，你是男校生？<br />
我以前聽過一個我覺得超恐佈遊戲處罰，叫「肥水不流別人田」，意即把受罰人個頭塞入馬桶再拉水。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hevangel</title>
		<link>http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/#comment-66261</link>
		<dc:creator>hevangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 05:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/#comment-66261</guid>
		<description>肥肥﹕好呀。你自願被圍﹖</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>肥肥﹕好呀。你自願被圍﹖</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 肥肥媽媽</title>
		<link>http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/#comment-66227</link>
		<dc:creator>肥肥媽媽</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/#comment-66227</guid>
		<description>你依個傳統好正!!! 不如得閒出嚟做吓?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>你依個傳統好正!!! 不如得閒出嚟做吓?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hevangel</title>
		<link>http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/#comment-65995</link>
		<dc:creator>hevangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/#comment-65995</guid>
		<description>gwen: 100% real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gwen: 100% real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwen</title>
		<link>http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/#comment-65848</link>
		<dc:creator>gwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/#comment-65848</guid>
		<description>this is so funny, is this for real?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is so funny, is this for real?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 加燦</title>
		<link>http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/#comment-65634</link>
		<dc:creator>加燦</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/#comment-65634</guid>
		<description>Horace,

Just for you. :)

&quot;The terms “convention” and “conventional” are flagrantly and intricately ambiguous. On the one hand, the conventional is the ordinary, the usual, the **traditional**, the orthodox as against the novel, the deviant, the unexpected, the heterodox. On the other hand, the conventional is the artificial, the invented, the optional, as against the natural, the fundamental, the mandatory (1989, p. 80).&quot;

source: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/convention/

Please I had a bit at the comments section of 
http://ca8hk.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/learning-something/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Horace,</p>
<p>Just for you. <img src='http://www.horace.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8220;The terms “convention” and “conventional” are flagrantly and intricately ambiguous. On the one hand, the conventional is the ordinary, the usual, the **traditional**, the orthodox as against the novel, the deviant, the unexpected, the heterodox. On the other hand, the conventional is the artificial, the invented, the optional, as against the natural, the fundamental, the mandatory (1989, p. 80).&#8221;</p>
<p>source: <a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/convention/" rel="nofollow">http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/convention/</a></p>
<p>Please I had a bit at the comments section of<br />
<a href="http://ca8hk.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/learning-something/" rel="nofollow">http://ca8hk.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/learning-something/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hevangel</title>
		<link>http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/#comment-65626</link>
		<dc:creator>hevangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/#comment-65626</guid>
		<description>Silver: True, but there is a subtle difference between convention and tradition.  Say I can use convention referring to the TCP/IP protocol specification, but I can&#039;t say the TCP/IP protocol specification is a tradition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silver: True, but there is a subtle difference between convention and tradition.  Say I can use convention referring to the TCP/IP protocol specification, but I can&#8217;t say the TCP/IP protocol specification is a tradition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hevangel</title>
		<link>http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/#comment-65625</link>
		<dc:creator>hevangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/#comment-65625</guid>
		<description>kempton: technically speaking, my entry still comply with the rule.  It has Chinese and it has English.  It also talks about convention and conventional wisdom.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kempton: technically speaking, my entry still comply with the rule.  It has Chinese and it has English.  It also talks about convention and conventional wisdom.  <img src='http://www.horace.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silver</title>
		<link>http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/#comment-65338</link>
		<dc:creator>Silver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 06:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/#comment-65338</guid>
		<description>Not really. If you look up the words carefully, you&#039;ll know convention and tradition can be on the same line, in some contexts, of course. So it just depends on what you write. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really. If you look up the words carefully, you&#8217;ll know convention and tradition can be on the same line, in some contexts, of course. So it just depends on what you write. <img src='http://www.horace.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hevangel</title>
		<link>http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/#comment-65334</link>
		<dc:creator>hevangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 06:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/03/28/%e5%85%a9%e5%91%a8%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%bc%9a%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e8%88%87%e5%82%b3%e7%b5%b1%e6%99%ba%e6%85%a7/#comment-65334</guid>
		<description>Silver: True, but even in that meaning, convention seems not as old as tradition.

kempton: It&#039;s not very violence, we do it every day.

lomichee: You can check my &quot;about&quot; page.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silver: True, but even in that meaning, convention seems not as old as tradition.</p>
<p>kempton: It&#8217;s not very violence, we do it every day.</p>
<p>lomichee: You can check my &#8220;about&#8221; page.  <img src='http://www.horace.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

