Comments on: 兩週一聚﹕假如我有魔法或超能力 http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/09/30/%e5%85%a9%e9%80%b1%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%b9%95%e5%81%87%e5%a6%82%e6%88%91%e6%9c%89%e9%ad%94%e6%b3%95%e6%88%96%e8%b6%85%e8%83%bd%e5%8a%9b/ Serious about the frivolous, frivolous about the serious Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:57:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: hevangel http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/09/30/%e5%85%a9%e9%80%b1%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%b9%95%e5%81%87%e5%a6%82%e6%88%91%e6%9c%89%e9%ad%94%e6%b3%95%e6%88%96%e8%b6%85%e8%83%bd%e5%8a%9b/#comment-72230 hevangel Sun, 04 Oct 2009 05:49:32 +0000 http://www.horace.org/blog/?p=3626#comment-72230 魔法不過是眾多辨法之一﹐也要運用得宜才可以解決問題。哈利波特都要讀七年魔法喇。 魔法不過是眾多辨法之一﹐也要運用得宜才可以解決問題。哈利波特都要讀七年魔法喇。

]]> By: hevangel http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/09/30/%e5%85%a9%e9%80%b1%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%b9%95%e5%81%87%e5%a6%82%e6%88%91%e6%9c%89%e9%ad%94%e6%b3%95%e6%88%96%e8%b6%85%e8%83%bd%e5%8a%9b/#comment-72229 hevangel Sun, 04 Oct 2009 05:47:58 +0000 http://www.horace.org/blog/?p=3626#comment-72229 好像沒有什麼故事又有魔法又有超能力﹐除了涼宮春日。 好像沒有什麼故事又有魔法又有超能力﹐除了涼宮春日。

]]> By: 方圓 http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/09/30/%e5%85%a9%e9%80%b1%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%b9%95%e5%81%87%e5%a6%82%e6%88%91%e6%9c%89%e9%ad%94%e6%b3%95%e6%88%96%e8%b6%85%e8%83%bd%e5%8a%9b/#comment-72226 方圓 Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:45:50 +0000 http://www.horace.org/blog/?p=3626#comment-72226 我認為有才能的人較喜歡發揮自的智慧，會用自己辦法處理問題。相反，笨人常常期望有魔法，因為有魔法便不用想辦法。 我認為有才能的人較喜歡發揮自的智慧，會用自己辦法處理問題。相反，笨人常常期望有魔法，因為有魔法便不用想辦法。

]]> By: 火羽 http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/09/30/%e5%85%a9%e9%80%b1%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%b9%95%e5%81%87%e5%a6%82%e6%88%91%e6%9c%89%e9%ad%94%e6%b3%95%e6%88%96%e8%b6%85%e8%83%bd%e5%8a%9b/#comment-72224 火羽 Sat, 03 Oct 2009 07:48:00 +0000 http://www.horace.org/blog/?p=3626#comment-72224 你最尾一段講先進科技和魔法沒有多大分別, 而超能力與天賦一樣. 即使超能力是天生, 都需要後天再開發, 訓練才能純熟運用, 不一定與生俱來就懂得控制~ 你講得好, 人類如果隨意進行時光旅行, 到時我們真的擁有超能力~ 我沒有說一定二選一, 可以兩者皆有~　：ｐ 你最尾一段講先進科技和魔法沒有多大分別, 而超能力與天賦一樣. 即使超能力是天生, 都需要後天再開發, 訓練才能純熟運用, 不一定與生俱來就懂得控制~ 你講得好, 人類如果隨意進行時光旅行, 到時我們真的擁有超能力~
我沒有說一定二選一, 可以兩者皆有~　：ｐ

]]> By: hevangel http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/09/30/%e5%85%a9%e9%80%b1%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%b9%95%e5%81%87%e5%a6%82%e6%88%91%e6%9c%89%e9%ad%94%e6%b3%95%e6%88%96%e8%b6%85%e8%83%bd%e5%8a%9b/#comment-72220 hevangel Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:04:10 +0000 http://www.horace.org/blog/?p=3626#comment-72220 When you read lots of sci-fi, you will think in a really macro level about humanity. Let me check your article. When you read lots of sci-fi, you will think in a really macro level about humanity.

Let me check your article.

]]> By: Haricot http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/09/30/%e5%85%a9%e9%80%b1%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%b9%95%e5%81%87%e5%a6%82%e6%88%91%e6%9c%89%e9%ad%94%e6%b3%95%e6%88%96%e8%b6%85%e8%83%bd%e5%8a%9b/#comment-72219 Haricot Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:19:14 +0000 http://www.horace.org/blog/?p=3626#comment-72219 10 million yrs - gosh you are optimistic :) BTW, I referenced your blog article in my posting earlier today. Thx !!! 10 million yrs – gosh you are optimistic :)

BTW, I referenced your blog article in my posting earlier today.

Thx !!!

]]> By: hevangel http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/09/30/%e5%85%a9%e9%80%b1%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%b9%95%e5%81%87%e5%a6%82%e6%88%91%e6%9c%89%e9%ad%94%e6%b3%95%e6%88%96%e8%b6%85%e8%83%bd%e5%8a%9b/#comment-72218 hevangel Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:54:55 +0000 http://www.horace.org/blog/?p=3626#comment-72218 The only way for human to survive in the long run (say 10 million years) is to keep developing more advance technology. Maybe one day, nano-tech, bio-tech and genetic-engineering is as common and safe as TV, airplane or mobile phone. The only way for human to survive in the long run (say 10 million years) is to keep developing more advance technology. Maybe one day, nano-tech, bio-tech and genetic-engineering is as common and safe as TV, airplane or mobile phone.

]]> By: hevangel http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/09/30/%e5%85%a9%e9%80%b1%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%b9%95%e5%81%87%e5%a6%82%e6%88%91%e6%9c%89%e9%ad%94%e6%b3%95%e6%88%96%e8%b6%85%e8%83%bd%e5%8a%9b/#comment-72217 hevangel Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:43:06 +0000 http://www.horace.org/blog/?p=3626#comment-72217 In Season 4, Sylar IS Nathan, so one of them has to disappear. In Season 4, Sylar IS Nathan, so one of them has to disappear.

]]> By: Haricot http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/09/30/%e5%85%a9%e9%80%b1%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%b9%95%e5%81%87%e5%a6%82%e6%88%91%e6%9c%89%e9%ad%94%e6%b3%95%e6%88%96%e8%b6%85%e8%83%bd%e5%8a%9b/#comment-72216 Haricot Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:17:53 +0000 http://www.horace.org/blog/?p=3626#comment-72216 >> ... Nathan 永遠不可能打贏 Sylar Well, maybe not by himself. We shall see :) >> … Nathan 永遠不可能打贏 Sylar

Well, maybe not by himself. We shall see :)

]]> By: Haricot http://www.horace.org/blog/2009/09/30/%e5%85%a9%e9%80%b1%e4%b8%80%e8%81%9a%ef%b9%95%e5%81%87%e5%a6%82%e6%88%91%e6%9c%89%e9%ad%94%e6%b3%95%e6%88%96%e8%b6%85%e8%83%bd%e5%8a%9b/#comment-72215 Haricot Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:09:46 +0000 http://www.horace.org/blog/?p=3626#comment-72215 佩服 hevangel天師指點, 魔法超能並非同出一轍之理論無懈可擊!!! >> ... 我們習以為常的高科技產品便是魔法道具 So, should we continue to develop and apply nanotechnology (e.g. injecting nano device into our blood-stream), biotechnology (e.g. genetically modified salmon and other foods that are being introduced into the ecosystem), genetic engineering (e.g. "super" race or gender selection), etc ??? 佩服 hevangel天師指點, 魔法超能並非同出一轍之理論無懈可擊!!!

>> … 我們習以為常的高科技產品便是魔法道具

So, should we continue to develop and apply nanotechnology (e.g. injecting nano device into our blood-stream), biotechnology (e.g. genetically modified salmon and other foods that are being introduced into the ecosystem), genetic engineering (e.g. “super” race or gender selection), etc ???

]]>