Confusion state of toothpaste

I ran out of toothpaste, so I have went to super market to buy a new one. Standing in front of the oral care aisle and I am confused. I don’t know which toothpaste should I buy. There are over thirty different kinds of toothpaste. I usually use Colgate, but even I ignore all other brands, there are still ten different kinds of Colgate toothpaste for me to choose. The product packaging is not very helpful. Other than I can tell the color and the taste of the toothpaste, I have no idea what those marketing jargon means or do they even have any meaning.

I try to read the fine prints on the toothpaste box and compare the difference in each of them. It turns out all toothpaste print the same boilerplate instruction on the box, it does not give me any useful information on the product itself. I can’t make up my mind when I don’t have any information to justify my decision. In the end, I resort to just looking at the price and buy the one that is on sale. If an average consumer like me can’t tell the difference among the products, what is the point for the toothpaste company making ten different kinds of toothpaste?

We are what we eat

I thought vegetarians who don’t eat meat are quite out of their mind. Then I met believers of Jainism who not only don’t eat meat, but also don’t eat any animal product like milk, honey or egg. Then I met the some weirdo who don’t eat any cooked or processed food. They only eat raw vegetables, fruits or nuts without any salad dressing. They claim all food has some sort of life energy which will disappear after cooking. Obviously no one with a right mind would believe in that superstitious non-sense﹐ yet I learn this stupid diet from a colleague who seems reasonable and intelligent. Maybe we can’t judge whether a person is a faddist or not from his appearance alone. You never know what ridiculous beliefs someone may hold inside his messed up brain.

According to anthropologist, eating meat and cooking food is what make us human as human. Human evolve to the top of the food chain and set us apart from other animals all thanks to meat and cooked food. Herbivores diet cannot supply the extra calories required to develop the brain of our prehistoric ancestors. Eating meat allow human to have huge brain with small guts that jump start human intelligence. Cooking breaks down starch molecules into more digestible fragment, break down amino-acid chain in protein molecules for the digestive enzymes and physically soften the food. Eating cooked food is more calories efficient, so human can further divert more energy for brain development. If human intelligence originates from eating meat and cooked food, then not eating meat or cooked food must be the lack of intelligence. Vegetarian, Jainism and raw foodist defy our human identify and evolutionary advantage. Their beliefs is on the verge of a dangerous path that lead us devolve back to animals.

Batman, The Dark Knight 蝙蝠俠黑夜之神

Dark Knight 若果不是Heath Ledger贏了奧斯卡最佳男配角﹐恐怕《黑夜之神》還要在我的硬碟不見天日好一段日子﹐慢慢排隊待我有空閒才開來看。不容否認Ledge的演譯很出色﹐把小丑戀態無常一面發揮得淋彌盡至。不過可能是我先入為主的觀念﹐始終Jack Nicolson才是我心目中永遠的小丑。看《黑夜之神》的時候有時不禁懷疑﹐蝙蝠俠只不過是個大配角﹐小丑才是這套電影的真正主角。動作場面故然由蝙蝠俠負責﹐但小丑則是把動作場面串連起來的靈魂。沒有小丑無常多變的陰謀﹐蝙蝠俠只不過個行行企企的特技人。

今集蝙蝠俠的動作指導交足功課﹐蝙蝠俠在香港夜空飛翔跳躍﹐最後用C-130運輸機拉線逃走很有噱頭。香港夜景比葛咸城還燦爛漂亮﹐大慨雙腳給重力綁在地上的香港人﹐與到從高空腑瞰的景色有不同感受。電單車那一場追逐戰也很不錯﹐不過對比上集蝙蝠車追逐那段遜色﹐最後以小丑與蝙蝠俠玩命終束。小丑賭蝙蝠俠不會殺死他﹐站立電單車正前方不動﹐蝙蝠俠最後果然扭軑閃避﹐結果撞車自傷收場。其實蝙蝠俠大可以學上集般瀟灑﹐說句我不會殺死你但也不會救你﹐然後自己跳車讓電單車撞死小丑﹐當然如果小丑死了戲也做不成了。

電影中的第二奸角雙面人﹐我認為編劇完全浪費了這個角色。在他未被小丑燒傷半邊面前﹐他作為蝙蝠俠的理想化身﹐代替他當葛咸城正義希望的像懲。後來他被小丑在醫院放了出來﹐從蝠蝠俠的影子淪為小丑的鬼儡﹐執意要為毀容和女朋友復仇。可惜他的復仇並不徹底﹐原本他擲毫的銀弊兩面相同﹐擲毫不過是一個戲劇化的小習慣﹐他決定了的事情便會付諸行動。慨然他決定了要為女朋友報仇﹐好應該把害死她的壞人統統殺掉﹐不必要依懶擲毫為他作決定。他從毀容前堅定不移的精神﹐到毀容後拿不定主意的改變﹐電影中的描述沒有足夠說服力﹐有點為求把角色配合漫畫原著﹐夾硬將他的性格從一個極端扭曲到另一個極端。

其實電影最精采的部份並非連場火爆的動作場面﹐而是小丑質問蝙蝠俠那幾段文戲﹐把蝙蝠俠本身亦正亦邪的矛盾表露無遺。很可惜蝙蝠俠只接受過忍者訓練﹐沒有接受過哲學訓練。小丑那是似是疑非的歪理﹐不過是拾存在主義論者的牙慧﹐蝙蝠俠可以用康德或維根斯坦去對應﹐不必被小丑的花言巧語所迷惑。面對小丑的質疑﹐也許用蝙蝠俠這個身份回答有點尷尬。在一般市民眼中蝙蝠俠與小丑同是怪人﹐會害怕是很自然的事。警方和政府對蝙蝠俠又愛又恨﹐一方面高興蝙蝠俠除暴安良﹐另一方要又怕他不受監管。只是蝙蝠俠忘記了自己的另一個身份﹐他除了是黑夜之神外﹐他還是權傾朝野的超級富豪。他白天的身份是葛咸城最有權勢的人﹐葛咸城差不多等同他的私人領地。蝙蝠俠根本不用著什麼大義名份﹐若果以領主的身份說話﹐他就有保護葛咸城的責任了。蝙蝠俠只是不過是領主的代理人﹐替他白天身份有效地管治葛咸城的手段。普通犯罪組織以利益為前題犯案﹐組成葛咸城地下經濟系統的一環﹐勉強來說也可以說是榮氏集團龐大利益體系的下游分支。小丑不按理出牌的作風﹐嚴重破壞葛咸城黑白兩道的平衡﹐直接影響榮氏集團的利益﹐蝙蝠俠當然要出手制裁小丑了。

很多電影評論喜歡談論小丑出的道德難題。如果蝙蝠俠不自揭身份﹐小丑便會每天殺一個人。若果不殺死上電視告密的律師﹐小丑便會炸毀一間醫院。要蝙蝠俠選擇救青梅竹馬的舊情人﹐還是救舊情人的新男友。其中最為人津津樂道是難題是兩個只能活一個。在兩隻船上裝搖炸彈﹐一隻船載著是普通市民﹐另一隻船載著監獄的囚犯﹐而兩隻船上有另一艘船的引爆器。很多人與蝙蝠俠一樣﹐對這些道德難題感到困繞﹐不知道應該如何作出正確的選擇。他們的目光受到小丑提供選擇的框框所限﹐看不到其實不只有兩個解決選擇。大慨只有雙面人看透小丑的技量﹐自編自導自認蝙蝠俠引小丑入局。蝙蝠俠太過拘泥於形式上的正義﹐他根本不用殺死小丑﹐只需要把小丑削成人棍﹐砍了他的四肢嚴刑迫供﹐便可以防止後來所有慘劇了。也許蝙蝠俠應該運用康德道德哲學﹐當小丑放棄身為人自主理性的責任時﹐他亦同時放棄受到道德公義保護的權利。蝙蝠俠大可以以其人之道還治其人之身。對著不講信用不講利益不講道德的瘋子﹐用任何手段去抹殺他才是最正確的選擇呢。

Greedy Vet

Today I just pay $400 to have my dog cut open for no reason. My dog, Charlie, has a big lump around his neck. The vet said it could be parathyroid cancer and suggest us to have the lump removed. We made appointment with the Vet for the dog have the surgery today. After the vet cut open Charlie, he found out it is not a parathyroid cancer. The high calcium in Charlie’s body maybe cause by some other cancer. Since the vet already open Charlie, I would expect him remove the lump even it is not a cancer tumor. It turns out the doctor just stitch up the opening without doing any operation. I am $400 short, Charlie has a wound around his neck and suffer from the pain of the surgery, but his condition has no change. I should ask for a refund from the vet for doing nothing useful.

When we picked up the dog, the vet suggest the dog take more test to diagnose the problem. He suggested us to do X-Ray, CAT scan or even MRI and those tests are expensive. More diagnosis means more money for the Vet, I can see why he suggest further treatment. But to us, what is the point of knowing what kind of cancer he has. My dog is 13 years old, it is almost at the end of its life. Even we know where the cancer is, we won’t let the dog to go through the painful and expensive cancer therapy. A dog won’t last forever. If Charlie die naturally in a painless way, it would be already be a blessing for him and for us.

I have been suggesting taking Charlie to SPCA to put him to sleep. Pat strongly disagree my idea. She said she would send me to SPCA before sending Charlie. I don’t quite understand why people are so attached to their pets. It is just an animal. Wouldn’t it less trouble or sometimes even cheaper to simply get a new one. It is kinda like buying a new computer to replace your old computer. All pets have to go at the end, so you can’t avoid feeling sad when losing your pet, it is just the matter of sooner or later. What is the point of extending the ownership when it brings you more trouble than joy? The owner should just bite the tongue, put it to sleep and suffer a brief moment of feeling bad instead of a prolong period of feeling bad.

Batman, Begins 蝙蝠俠俠影之謎

Batman Begins 雖然我不是蝙蝠俠的擁躉﹐不過我倒看全了所有蝙蝠俠電影。與其他超級英雄不同的地方﹐蝙蝠俠是沒有超能力的普通人。他的能力來自他的財富﹐供他購買各種高科技蝙蝠武器。八十年代第一代蝙蝠俠電影﹐塑造出黑色美學的葛咸城﹐引為一時佳話。可惜蝙蝠俠系列越拍越差﹐第四集雖然星光熠熠﹐請來多位巨星客串飾演奸角﹐但電影卻爛到無可挽救的地步。想不到在零五年這個系列可以重出生天﹐把過去拍壞的續集像粉筆字抹去﹐將故事還原最初由頭重新開始。只是葛咸城不再有哥德式的建築﹐蝙蝠俠的儀器不再是復古科幻的風格﹐蝠蝙俠活在一個非常普通的現代城市。

俠影之謎從蝙蝠俠父母被殺開始﹐慢慢鋪排他入行當罪惡剋星的經過。蝙蝠俠接受忍者訓練出身有些奇怪﹐不過倒解釋了他為什麼可以來無蹤去無景。今集老管家這個重要角色一分為二﹐以住老管家一手包辨所有蝙蝠武器。今集武器的部份改由摩根費曼負責﹐蝙蝠俠的家族企業是軍火公司﹐蝠蝙武器是從研究開發部門直接弄來的測試品。蝙蝠衣的軍用防彈裝甲﹐蝙蝠車是軍用越野裝甲車。在眾多武器中﹐蝙蝠俠的斗蓬的解釋最合理。以前看眼化斗蓬隨風飄揚﹐總是覺得這件斗蓬中看不中用﹐背上多了幅布打架時豈不阻手阻腳。今集的斗蓬是納米記憶布料﹐可以藉著通電流而變型﹐成為滑翔翼或降落傘。最後一場打鬥是蝙蝠俠波戰忍者師父﹐其實蝙蝠俠技不如人﹐不過靠高科技強化裝甲﹐砌斷了師父的忍者劍﹐才可以最後關頭反敗為勝。若果研發部的老主管不供應新武器給蝙蝠俠﹐他就只是個一無是處的有錢仔。

女主角的戲份恰到好處﹐只是裝飾用的大花瓶﹐編劇沒有夾硬加插愛情橋套﹐影響動作場面的連貫性。蝠蝙車在屋頂和公路上追車那一段最精彩﹐單看這一場戲已經值回票價。蝙蝠俠打壞人多似在玩花式特技﹐飛來飛去左一拳右一腳﹐反正觀眾早知道蝙蝠俠不會有什麼危險﹐也沒有所謂的緊張刺激。倒是蝙蝠俠初次上陣有點好笑﹐還未有斗蓬從高處跳下幾乎跌死。以往蝙蝠俠的對手是犯眾集團﹐在法律管不到的地方作出私下的正義制裁。這集的對手換成要毀滅葛咸城的忍者集團﹐儘管他們要殺死所有人的理由很荒謬﹐蝙蝠俠的立場從黑夜判官變成全城的救世者。他沒有了質疑自己以暴易暴的心理包伏﹐可以很義無反顧到打倒敵人﹐少了舊蝙蝠俠內心道德交戰的那份劇情張力。

總括來說這是一套很男性化的爆谷電影﹐ 大慨這就是我這麼多年來﹐追看所有蝙蝠俠電影的主要理由吧。