從哲學哲學雞蛋糕那兒借來的圖﹐雖說這是回應網路留言的方法﹐說穿了其實是寫哲學論文的規格。有建設性的網路留言﹐其實與研究哲學一樣﹐是很好的思辯訓練。
Tag Archives: philosophy
I joke, therefore I am
This is the forth speech in the Humorously Speaking manual. The objective of the speech is to open with a self-depreciating joke and use at least two sets of series of jokes in the body.
Many of you may already know I am studying philosophy in SFU part time. I have learned to reason like Descartes, debate like Socrates. I though my arguments are invincible, until I have an disagreement with my wife. She simply says, “Honey, you are wrong.”
Dear Mr. Chairman, fellow toastmasters. I joke, therefore I am. Many people think philosophy is useless, boring and difficult. The mafia boss gives offers no one can reject, a mafia boss who studies philosophy gives offers no one can understand. I was a curious little boy since I was young. I like to answer weird questions like, Is there a God; What is good and evil; Do I exist? When my mom annoyed by my questions, she would just told me to shut up. Later when I grew older, I found all those questions all under a discipline called philosophy. Philosophy means the love of wisdom literally. I found philosophy very interesting and thought provoking.
The first course I took in philosophy is the history of philosophy. I learned philosophers from Plato to Aristotle, Descartes to Hume, Kant to Hegel. If you asked me what do they have in common? They are all dead. I learned that for every great philosopher, there exists an equal an opposite philosopher; and both of them are wrong. I did not get the answer for my questions, instead I got ten different answers and why each of them is wrong.
I still could not answer my questions, but I learn a few things about philosophers. I learned Occam shaves with a razor; Hume eats with a fork and Russell’s teapot is lost in space. I know Schrodinger has a cat, Pascal is addicted to gambling and God said Nietzsche is dead.
The mind-body problem always intrigue me. How do I know I really exists, not merely a brain living in a test tube hook up to the Matrix? I took a course in metaphysics to find the answers. Metaphysics means studies beyond our physical world, question the foundation of reality. In the end I figured out the answer to the mind-body problem. What is a mind? No matter. What is a body? Never mind.
Recently, I took a course in ethics to learn what is right from wrong or how to argue a wrong is a right. In the class, I learned different ethical theories. Aristotle said doing good is a virtue; Kant said doing good is our duty; Locke said doing good is having a good end result; Hobby said doing good is like we agree not to kill each other. I am a bit confused where ethics comes from. As an engineer, I know electricity comes from electron, so morality must comes from morons.
Although I am inspired to become a philosopher, but I end up being an engineer. Do you know what is the difference between a philosopher and an engineer? About 80k per year. Philosophers think hard on many great questions of all time. They think about the meaning of life, the dilemma of truth, the existence of the world, but they forgot the most important question: How to make a living?
The philosophy department in SFU is having a meeting. Suddenly an angel appears in the room in front of dean of the philosophy department and says, “I’ll grant you whichever of three blessings you choose. Wisdom, beauty or ten million dollars.” Without hesitation, the professor chooses wisdom. There is a flash of lighting, the professor is transformed, but then he just sits there, staring down at the table. One of his colleagues whispers, “You have great wisdom. Say something!” The professor says, “I should have taken the money!”
兩週一聚﹕世界觀
前言﹕這是一個叫「兩周一聚」的活動。是網友米雪兒發起。每月十五日﹑三十日﹐一班住在世界不同角落的香港人都會一起寫同一個題目。今天是第十三次相聚,由 tzigane 出題,主題定為「世界觀」。
每一個人的世界觀也不相同﹐有些人的世界觀來自家庭文化背景﹐有些人的世界觀來自他們的宗教信仰。細想我的世界觀從何而來﹐大慨是通過我閱讀的書藉﹐逐點逐點吸收書本中的想法﹐潛移默化下薰荼成為自己的想法。
不計算兒童時代看的童話故事﹐最早影響我日後想法的書﹐就是衛斯理的科幻小說。五年級看第一本衛斯理﹐小學未畢業已看罷全套。用現在的眼光來看﹐衛斯理的科幻小說其實不入流。不過衛斯理的世界觀﹐已經烙印在我年紀輕輕的腦海中。世界有很多未知的事物﹐也許日常生活中不會遇見外星人﹐幽靈﹐巫術﹐鬼神﹐但不代表那些事物不可能存在。所以我們應該要開放心靈﹐去迎接任何有可能發生的事情。
中二的時候我遇上了金庸﹐這次只用了四個月時間便讀完十四部天書﹐再在餘下的半年重覆讀了不只數次。很多人說第一本看的金庸﹐足以影響所以金庸作品的印象。不知道算幸還是不幸﹐當年我從父親書櫃隨手拿起第一本金庸竟然是《鹿鼎記》﹐金庸的最後一本作品﹐亦是一本反武俠傳統的武俠小說。我學不到郭倩的忠義﹐學不到楊過的深情﹐學不到令狐沖的瀟灑﹐倒學了韋小寶的是非道德觀。國家民族意識薄弱﹐行事不受道德教條規範束縛﹐不過還能分清楚大是大非。
不記得是中四還是中五那年﹐逛中華書局時隨意翻開田中芳樹的《銀河英雄傳說》。讀了序章後放不釋手﹐於是捧了一套二十本小說回家。這套小說不只是流行科幻小說﹐可以說是政治學教材﹐改寫一整代年輕人的思潮。楊威利對萊茵哈特﹐民主對獨裁﹐自由對極權﹐正義對正義。就算現在網上參與政治議題的討論﹐久不久也會看見有人引用楊威利的名言。中國的憤青也許應該讀讀這小說﹐讀完後或許他們不會再盲目崇拜大中國主義。不論是陳一諤的六四歪理﹐還是成龍的中國人太自由﹐也可以從楊威利的想思找到答案。
受到衛斯理的啟蒙﹐我愛上看真正的科幻小說﹐科幻小說大師阿西莫夫更是我的最愛。在加拿大讀高校的時候﹐在學校圖書館借了本《永恆的終結》。這本小說在眾多阿西莫夫的小說中並出名﹐沒有《基地系列》或《機械人系列》的宏觀世界﹐好像現在還絕版了﹐想買也買不到。故事講述人類發明了時光機﹐可以返回過去改寫歷史﹐把人類所犯的錯誤統統修正。最後結局很曲拆離奇﹐人類的最大錯誤便是發明了時光機﹐令人類不再犯錯﹐亦同時奪去了人類從錯誤中成長的可能性。時光機的最後任務便是返回過去﹐阻止愛因斯坦研究時光機理論﹐取而代之促成核子彈的研究。讓人類可以從戰爭中成長﹐最終成為宇宙的統治者。現在很多人認為新科技帶來新問題﹐他們認為這些新科技最好沒有出現。他們忘記了只有以科技才能解決科技的問題。若果不去面對克服這些問題﹐人類最終就會像小說中的平衡宇宙般﹐呆坐守著這個地球等待死亡的來臨。
從大學開始我每星期也看《經濟學人》雜誌﹐大學中的選修課也讀了經濟學﹐更是由明星級教授Larry Smith任教。雖然不是主修經濟學﹐深一點的經濟學分析看不明白﹐但作為一個經濟人的基本思維﹐早已深深扎根在我的腦袋裏。我在經濟學和政治哲學是典型右派主場﹐反對政府干預和支持自由市場。在報章或網上看見持左派思想的人寫的文章﹐我總會不期然分析批評他們文章中謬誤。現在工餘時修讀哲學﹐讀過馬克思的原著﹐左派自由主義的理論﹐看法開始有一點改變。左派想思並不是完全一無可取﹐左派的出現是嘗試去解決右派思想中的一些問題﹐而那些問題也是確切的存在。只是左派除了指出問題外﹐還嘗試提供一套解決方法。只可惜那些解決方法並不可行﹐只會衍生比問題本身更加嚴重的新問題。
近幾年開始修讀哲學﹐對世界觀這個問題有新的體會。在課程中我學習認識不同的世界觀﹐大慨所有人世界觀的組成﹐都可以分別追朔到某一個哲學家的某一個想法。當我每學期修讀新一科哲學課﹐接觸新的哲學思想﹐也會讓我的世界觀會產生變化。我一直以為自己十分反對某些哲學思想﹐在讀完那科明白那些思想的正確解讀後﹐卻發現自己的思考模式原來一直也受其思想影響。我有一個念頭希望能夠實踐﹐就是把自己世界觀的思想地圖繪畫出來﹐從開始到終結追蹤我所有想法的來龍去脈。這是一個非常具野心的計劃﹐可以說是作為自我存在的終極反思。這個計劃剛剛邁出了第一步﹐不是指這篇文章﹐而是指我安裝了Wiki並正學習使用﹐打算用來記錄我的哲學筆記﹐以便可以重組出我的思考地圖。
其他文章﹕ The Man Who Loves Everton、chilli mom 、Haricot、wanni、HumptiDumpti、longqt、周游、lomichee、Nankin、洛言、Michelle、軍師奶、讀食、hevangel、athrunz、Mugen C、coffee、芸、kempton、mad dog、火羽