{"id":3086,"date":"2009-06-12T00:42:57","date_gmt":"2009-06-12T08:42:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/?p=3086"},"modified":"2009-06-12T00:42:57","modified_gmt":"2009-06-12T08:42:57","slug":"mars-is-hard","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2009\/06\/12\/mars-is-hard\/","title":{"rendered":"Mars Is Hard"},"content":{"rendered":"

\nHuman should look above our head gazing into the stars instead of look down on the mundane Earth. Environmental protection is just an intermediate solutions that buy us more time The Earth won’t last forever. Space is the final frontier.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

<\/p>\n

Fifty years ago, space experts thought we’d be there by now. Here’s why we’re not<\/strong><\/em>
\nBY Fred Guterl, Monica Heger (June 2009 IEEE Spectrum)<\/p>\n

Wernher von Braun would be so disappointed. The German-born rocket pioneer accomplished great things in his life, including overseeing the design of the Saturn rockets, the most powerful launch vehicles ever built. But he never saw the thing he yearned for most: people walking on Mars.<\/p>\n

He did try mightily to make it happen. Shortly after World War II, when he was living at Fort Bliss, Texas, he wrote his only novel, Project Mars , about an expedition to the Red Planet. The book is packed with detailed explanations of orbital physics and unintentionally hilarious mission directives: \u201dThe landing is to be carried out, if possible, with avoidance of any hostile contact with the inhabitants of Mars.\u201d Ultimately, the lead spaceship ski-lands onto the Martian snow, and its crew of 18 befriends the underground-dwelling Martians. The year is 1985.<\/p>\n

Through the 1950s and \u201960s and into the \u201970s, von Braun tirelessly propounded his Mars vision, in a group of articles for Collier’s Weekly and later in a series of television specials for Walt Disney. During the Nixon administration, he was still pleading for a Mars landing by 1982.<\/p>\n

Most of the other pieces of the von Braun dream eventually came to pass: A permanent space station orbits Earth, for example, and 12 men have walked on the moon. And yet, a Mars trip seems no closer now than it did in 1977, when von Braun died.<\/p>\n

Turns out that going to Mars is a lot harder than he let on. It\u2019s expensive, for one. In his novel, von Braun figured that a Mars expedition would cost US $2 billion\u2014about $18 billion in today\u2019s dollars. By 1989, NASA estimated such a trip would come to half a trillion dollars; if you correct that figure for inflation, you get the current U.S. fiscal stimulus package, give or take a hundred million.<\/p>\n

Spooked by those numbers back in 2007, when a trillion dollars still seemed like a ridiculous amount of money for even the U.S. government to spend, Congress stipulated in a NASA appropriations bill that \u201dnone of the funds…shall be used for any research, development, or demonstration activities related exclusively to the human exploration of Mars.\u201d The Red Planet has undeniable cachet, but nowhere near the geopolitical punch that the moon had in the early 1960s, in the frigid depths of the Cold War. It\u2019s hard to imagine a Mars project ever getting a presidential exhortation on the order of John F. Kennedy\u2019s 1961 speech launching the Apollo program. And with the global economy on life support, you have to wonder if we\u2019ll even get there before the century is out.<\/p>\n

If going to the moon is a day hike, going to Mars is the Lewis and Clark expedition\u2014a journey too long and too complex to carry everything that\u2019s needed. Earth and Mars ride along in their concentric orbits, getting within striking distance of each other only for a brief window every two years. The shortest one-way trip, using conventional chemical propulsion, would take six months. If you include the time spent on Mars waiting for the two planets to move back into optimal alignment and also the trip home, the total mission would last at least two and a half years. The crew would have to endure extremes of boredom, isolation, and radiation, and they would require a vast amount of fuel and rations packed into a vessel sturdy enough to shield them from the harshness of space. Simply landing a spacecraft safely on a planet with an atmosphere and substantial gravity poses stunning challenges. And then there\u2019s the matter of keeping the crew alive on the Martian surface.<\/p>\n

In other words, the physical, technical, and economic demands of a Martian mission are too great to be overcome in a decadelong, Apollo-like sprint. The only solution is to chip away at the problems. And that\u2019s just what\u2019s happening.<\/p>\n

Despite the congressional directive, NASA engineers have continued to move the agency slowly but inexorably in the general direction of Mars. Along with its counterparts in Europe and Asia and legions of academic researchers around the world, the space agency has spent years laying the groundwork for such a mission. The International Space Station, for example, hasn\u2019t yielded much in the way of basic science, but it\u2019s letting astronauts learn how to deal with issues like weightlessness, equipment failures, and the day-to-day routine of life beyond Earth. A lunar base will teach spacefarers and mission planners lessons about running an extraterrestrial outpost and will also push the development of NASA\u2019s Ares V booster, which will likely be needed to loft the capsules, crew, and supplies for a Mars mission, unless better alternatives come to fruition.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, orbiters, landers, and rovers continue to gather vital information about the Red Planet, including the best places to find water and minerals. Upcoming sample-return probes to Mars, like Europe\u2019s ExoMars and Russia\u2019s Phobos-Grunt, will let researchers back on Earth touch Martian soil for the first time. All of these efforts will help set the stage for an eventual human mission.<\/p>\n

When that happens\u2014if it happens\u2014it will be the most difficult and complicated undertaking in human history.<\/p>\n

The list of challenges is long and sobering, and it starts with propulsion. Chemical rockets are only marginally capable of getting people to Mars and back, but the main alternative, the plasma drive, is at least a couple of decades away from the day when it\u2019ll be ready to ferry folks to that red dot in the sky [see \u201dRockets for the Red Planet,\u201d in this issue].<\/p>\n

Even after the propulsion problem is solved, there are at least five other really big ones: cosmic rays, muscle and bone loss, psychological stress, landing on the planet, and feeding the crew for the long haul. All of those challenges are harder with chemical rockets, because a chemically fueled trip would last much longer than one with a more advanced propulsion technology.<\/p>\n

That time sensitivity is acute with cosmic rays, the combination of energetic protons ejected by the sun during solar storms and gamma-ray bursts from distant galaxies. You\u2019re not at risk on Earth\u2019s surface, because you\u2019re shielded by the planet\u2019s atmosphere and magnetic field. But out in space, you don\u2019t have that protection. Of particular concern are solar storms, which can toss out deadly particle showers that can kill you quickly or slowly, depending on the storm\u2019s severity. And both types of cosmic radiation can damage DNA, raising your long-term risk of cancer. Gamma rays might even make you stupid; regular doses can wreak havoc on brain cells, among other things.<\/p>\n

Apollo astronauts were fortunate in not encountering a solar storm during their missions, none of which lasted longer than 12 days. But a Mars crew would almost certainly experience at least one solar storm and regular doses of gamma rays. Scientists estimate that astronauts on a 1000-day mission will be exposed to just over 1 sievert of radiation, equal to about 26 000 dental X-rays.<\/p>\n

Nobody really knows exactly what such a dose would do to a crew or to what extent high-energy particles correlate to cancer rates. Officially, NASA rules dictate that any manned mission have a fatality risk below 3 percent. On paper, at least, a Mars mission isn\u2019t too far off: For a 40-year-old male astronaut, the space agency puts the mean fatality risk due to cancer at 4 percent. But few physiologists put much stock in that number, and besides, variation among individuals makes it impossible to say who will develop cancer and who won\u2019t.<\/p>\n

One way to lower the radiation risk is to build your spacecraft with thick walls. The astronauts\u2019 sleeping quarters on the International Space Station, for instance, are lined with polyethylene, which helps block the incoming protons during a solar storm. The station is also always within the confines of Earth\u2019s magnetic field, which offers additional protection.<\/p>\n

The 10-centimeter-thick walls of most current spacecraft block about 25 percent of cosmic rays, but there\u2019s no good way to keep out much more without making the walls so thick they\u2019d add greatly to the weight. \u201dThe amount of material you need is enormous,\u201d says Francis Cucinotta, chief scientist in the radiation department of NASA\u2019s human research program, in Houston. You might think a lining made of lead would be effective, but when the high-energy electrons in cosmic rays hit the lead, they can trigger secondary radiation that\u2019s just as damaging.<\/p>\n

One possibility is to re-create the physics of Earth and use a magnetic field. Last year researchers from the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in Didcot, England, built a magnetic shield in the lab that was able to block a beam of heavy ions and protons, says physicist Ruth Bamford, who led the research. Bamford borrowed the technology from nuclear-fusion research, in which high-intensity magnetic fields are used to contain the energetic plasma where the fusion takes place. Now her team is trying to scale up their shield so that they can test it in space. She estimates that the field could be as small as 100 meters long, just large enough to form a protective bubble around the habitable parts of the spacecraft. This bubble would require a 1-tesla magnet and about a kilowatt of electricity to maintain.<\/p>\n

Researchers are also considering new radiation-blocking materials, new drugs to treat cancer and other illnesses caused by radiation exposure, and even genetic tests that would identify cancer risk. Or maybe the answer is to choose only older male astronauts: The older you are, the less likely you are to live long enough to develop cancer, and men are less likely than women to develop breast cancer, one of the most common types of cancer linked to radiation.<\/p>\n

\u201dFor a manned mission to Mars, I don\u2019t think there\u2019s a magic bullet,\u201d says Cucinotta. \u201dBut I think a combination of things will make it allowable.\u201d<\/p>\n

The ravages of space aren\u2019t confined to radiation; the lack of gravity is arguably even more vexing. Astronauts on average lose 1.5 percent of their bone mass for each month they spend in a weightless environment, and the rate of muscle loss can be much higher. On short excursions, astronauts can lose up to 20 percent of their muscle mass; during multimonth missions, the figure can reach 50 percent. Some astronauts and cosmonauts have returned from long missions without enough musculature to walk and had to be removed from their reentry craft on stretchers.<\/p>\n

Exercise on Earth brings back the muscles and bones. A much better solution is to do regular workouts in space that limit or even prevent the loss in the first place. That\u2019s why NASA now requires visitors to the International Space Station to spend between 30 minutes and 2 hours a day exercising. On the ISS, they have access to an exercise bicycle, a treadmill with a harness that provides a downward force, and also an Interim Resistance Exercise Device. This machine provides resistive force by means of a system of pulleys and elastomers. U.S. astronaut Daniel Tani, who spent four months on the space station in 2007, says that exercise helped him maintain most of the muscle strength in his arms and legs. Other muscles, though, like the ones needed to hold his head up, had atrophied. \u201dIf I turned my head too quickly, I\u2019d lose my balance,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n

Another option may be to simulate gravity by using centrifugal force. In a memorable scene from the motion picture 2001: A Space Odyssey , an astronaut jogs within a large spinning compartment, as the spaceship in which it is mounted streaks toward Jupiter. It\u2019s a neat idea, but it could be tricky to pull off. If the habitat rotates too quickly, for instance, crew members may get dizzy or sick when they turn their heads. And if it\u2019s too small, they may feel a \u201dgravity gradient\u201d between their heads and feet. Studies indicate that you\u2019d need a 56-meter-radius structure turning at 4 rotations per minute to supply about 1 g of artificial gravity. Alternatively, you could build a human-size centrifuge inside the spacecraft to provide short, high doses of artificial gravity\u2014say, 1 hour a day at 2 or 3 g\u2019s. But neither concept has been vetted in the microgravity environment of space.<\/p>\n

Whatever form it takes, exercise will be vital for keeping crews healthy for the months-long journey to Mars. Peter Cavanagh, professor of orthopedics and sports medicine at the University of Washington, in Seattle, thinks crews will have to augment their exercise by taking drugs normally used to treat osteoporosis. And before they land on the Red Planet, they will have to prep themselves intensively by doing exercises that focus on reactions, quick movements, and fine motor control. \u201dAll the reflexes we depend on are gravity based, and we\u2019re going to need them again when we get back to the gravity of Mars,\u201d says Cavanagh.<\/p>\n

Maintaining bone and muscle mass won\u2019t do much good if, in the meantime, the space travelers lose their minds. And that, unfortunately, is an all-too-real possibility.<\/p>\n

Russia\u2019s Mir space station, which remained in orbit for 15 years before being deposited into the Pacific Ocean in 2001, is a case study in space stress. During one particularly troubling period in 1997, an onboard fire almost killed the crew. Shortly thereafter, cosmonaut Vasily Tsibliyev bungled a routine docking maneuver, sending an incoming supply ship crashing into the station; the collision knocked out power to half the orbiter. Tsibliyev soon developed an irregular heartbeat, which Russian psychologists attributed\u2014no surprise here\u2014to extreme stress. When his crewmates attempted to repair the power outage, someone\u2014possibly the hapless Tsibliyev\u2014mistakenly unplugged an onboard computer that sent the space station spinning. (Upon leaving Mir at the end of his six-month stint, the cosmonaut reportedly said, \u201dThank God.\u201d)<\/p>\n

Being cooped up for months in a tin can no bigger than a two-bedroom apartment won\u2019t be easy. In Earth orbit, you at least have the comfort of knowing that you can get home, for example, by jumping into a Soyuz capsule for the hour-long descent back to Earth. A crew going to Mars would have no such easy escape from their cramped, hazardous, and isolated environment.<\/p>\n

\u201dHumans will experience an environment and conditions that are really unlike anything they\u2019ve experienced before,\u201d notes David Dinges, who is head of the neurobehavioral and psychosocial research team at the National Space Biomedical Research Institute, in Houston. \u201dIt\u2019s not unlikely that they\u2019ll become depressed or that there will be a conflict between crew members or that they\u2019ll need to communicate with a family member,\u201d he says. Should arguments arise or loneliness, stress, or anxiety set in, crew members would have to deal with it largely on their own.<\/p>\n

So they\u2019ll have to be chosen very carefully. The first step will probably be to weed out anyone prone to depression, anxiety, claustrophobia, or any other condition that could be a problem in deep space. After that, the criteria become more complex, in some cases even nonintuitive. For example, psychologists who\u2019ve studied what types of people work best together have found that crews from different cultures tend to get along better than crews who are more like one another.<\/p>\n

Could sexual tension doom a mission? Studies of mixed-gender crews on board space stations and submarines and at Antarctic bases, and also in simulations lasting weeks or months, have produced mixed results. On some missions, women have been credited for being peacemakers and contributing to a sense of calm. Sexual jealousies do arise, though: During a 110-day simulation in Russia in 1999, a female participant reported unwelcome advances from the team\u2019s male commander, shortly after two other male crewmates got into a bloody fistfight; the episodes prompted another team member to quit.<\/p>\n

But single-sex teams aren\u2019t the answer either, says Jay Buckey, a former astronaut and now a professor at Dartmouth Medical School, in Hanover, N.H. Generalizations based on gender don\u2019t begin to capture people\u2019s individual differences. And in an attempt to avoid sexual rivalries, you\u2019d exclude qualified people and limit crew diversity. \u201dThere\u2019s been a lot of discussion about gender makeup, but ultimately what you\u2019re looking for is people who can demonstrate a good ability to work together,\u201d Buckey says. Any crew bound for Mars will spend months training together before departure, he adds, giving ample time to evaluate their cohesiveness.<\/p>\n

Once the crew is chosen, computers might help them coexist. Yes, even the unpredictable realm of human emotion is likely to be parsed by software. Dinges is working on a face-recognition program that reads expressions and detects changes in emotion. At the start of a trip, an onboard computer would have a database of the range of facial expressions for each astronaut. During the voyage, cameras positioned around the ship would capture everyone\u2019s facial expressions, which the computer would compare to its baseline images, constantly evaluating whether the astronauts are feeling emotions\u2014happiness, sadness, anger, anxiety, or stress\u2014strong enough to warrant a follow-up.<\/p>\n

And if the computer spots a worrying trend? More software! (Specialization, it seems, is the trend for programs as well as professionals.) James Cartreine, a research psychologist at Harvard Medical School, is leading a group developing a multimedia program called the Virtual Space Station. It mimics behavioral therapy, a form of psychotherapy in which the patient is guided to resolve his own problem, whether it\u2019s a crewmate who snores too loud or homesickness or profound boredom.<\/p>\n

So will astronauts really pour out their innermost frustrations and fears to a bunch of microchips? Cartreine insists they will. \u201dPeople are not as likely to reveal problems they are embarrassed about to a real person,\u201d he says. A virtual therapist may even be more thorough, he argues, because it won\u2019t forget to follow up and make sure that old problems have been dealt with.<\/p>\n

Of course, the system could be easily thwarted: Astronauts could put on a happy face or lie about their problems. Mission planners would have to convince the crew beforehand that the technology could really help them, Cartreine says.<\/p>\n

Better communications technology, too, will help bolster weary, lonely astronauts. To reduce the isolation, you\u2019d want the crew to be able to send and receive audio and video in real time, reliably and whenever the mood struck them. But that would tax NASA\u2019s current interplanetary communications system, known as the Deep Space Network.<\/p>\n

NASA engineers had hoped to launch a dedicated telecommunications satellite sometime this year that would have demonstrated a laser-based technology capable of sending data at up to 30 megabits per second, about five times as fast as what\u2019s currently possible. To work, the laser beam must be pointed with great accuracy, and it\u2019s vulnerable to interruption by clouds and other obstacles. But those drawbacks aren\u2019t what doomed the Mars Telecommunications Orbiter; NASA canceled the program in 2005 to free up money for other projects.<\/p>\n

Assuming the crew survives the long voyage without being killed or killing one another, then yet another monumental challenge will come: landing safely on the Red Planet.<\/p>\n

Even without a crew on board, the feat is hellishly difficult. When the rover Spirit descended to the Martian surface in January 2004, NASA scientists described the white-knuckle landing as \u201d6 minutes of terror.\u201d The spacecraft carrying the rover streaked into the atmosphere like a meteor, traveling at 19 000 kilometers per hour. A heat shield slowed the craft to 1600 km\/h, still nearly twice as fast as a commercial airliner. Then followed a supersonic parachute deployment and a complex series of retro-rocket firings. Just 5 seconds before impact, the lander\u2019s air bags inflated, and it hit the ground at 87 km\/h, bouncing like a beach ball in a hurricane until it finally rolled to a stop. And all that was actually part of the plan.<\/p>\n

Bear in mind that Spirit weighed 185 kilograms, a tiny fraction of what a manned module would weigh. Had a human crew been aboard, they would have been subjected to forces of 40 g\u2019s. Most people black out at between 7 and 9 g\u2019s, and that\u2019s if they\u2019re wearing antigravity suits; a force of 16 g\u2019s can kill you if it lasts longer than a minute. (It\u2019s also true, though, that race-car drivers have endured more than 70 g\u2019s in crashes and lived to tell the story.)<\/p>\n

The basic problem is that the Martian atmosphere is both too thin and not thin enough. It\u2019s not thin enough to allow landing solely with retro-rockets. At supersonic speeds, retro-rockets create turbulence that would make the spacecraft difficult to control and cause it to shake so badly that it could break apart. That wasn\u2019t a problem for the Apollo lunar landers, because the moon has no air and thus no turbulence. A thrusters-only landing on Mars would also consume a huge amount of fuel.<\/p>\n

But the atmosphere is too thin (about 1\/100th of what Earth has) for a craft to glide to a landing as the space shuttle does: There\u2019s too little atmospheric friction to slow the vehicle down. A spacecraft would still be going thousands of kilometers an hour just 10 km from the surface. Maddeningly, though, Mars\u2019s slight atmosphere is just enough to cause heat from friction, so the spacecraft needs an aerodynamic design and thermal shielding to keep from burning up as it descends.<\/p>\n

NASA engineers think the best approach is a two-phase landing. In the first phase, the ship would slow itself down to about 1600 km\/h, perhaps using small retro-rockets on the spacecraft\u2019s belly. To avoid creating turbulence, the rockets could be angled away from each other so that their exhaust plumes wouldn\u2019t envelop the spacecraft\u2019s nose. That solution is now being studied by Rob Manning and his team at NASA\u2019s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), in Pasadena, Calif. They engineered the successful landings of the Mars rovers Sojourner, Spirit, and Opportunity, and they are now trying to figure out the best way to land the Mars Science Laboratory, or MSL, a robotic mission to be launched in 2011. At 900 kg, it will be the largest payload yet to land on Mars, Manning notes, but that\u2019s peanuts compared to a crewed module, which will weigh 40 to 70 times as much. \u201dIf we\u2019re having a hard time landing 900 kilograms, how the heck are we going to land 40 tons?\u201d says Manning.<\/p>\n

Another option for the first phase is to deploy a huge inflatable \u201danchor\u201d to create drag. Vertigo, a small company in Lake Elsinore, Calif., is working on such a device, which it calls the Hypercone Supersonic Decelerator. Made from lightweight fabric, it would rapidly inflate, air-bag style, into a flattened cone about the size of a Boeing 747.<\/p>\n

The second phase of landing would start once the spacecraft had slowed to 1600 km\/h. Manning\u2019s engineers at JPL haven\u2019t yet figured out the optimal answer for that either, but it may involve a quick deployment of parachutes followed by more thrusters.<\/p>\n

Complicating matters is the fact that landing techniques for Mars can\u2019t be fully tested on Earth, because the gravity and atmospheric density here are so much greater. \u201dThere are a lot of unknowns,\u201d notes Bret Drake, chief architect for NASA\u2019s moon-Mars program. He\u2019s optimistic that people can be safely landed on Mars, but it won\u2019t happen soon. \u201dIt will be at least 20 years before we have a viable solution,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n

If you think sorting cans and bottles is a pain, consider the extreme recycling you\u2019d need to do on a Mars trip. Start with water: The average astronaut aboard the space station uses about 11 liters of it a day. So for a five-person crew on a 1000-day trip, you\u2019d need 55 000 liters. That\u2019s enough to fill about 350 bathtubs, and it would weigh 55 000 kg\u2014way too much to carry aboard a spacecraft.<\/p>\n

It should be possible, though, to recycle up to 90 percent of all the water an astronaut consumes, says Robert Zubrin, president of Pioneer Astronautics and founder of the Mars Society. To do that, the crew would have to capture, clean, and reuse every drop of water involved in cooking and bathing\u2014and peeing and sweating, too. Once on Mars, additional water could be extracted by melting and purifying the planet\u2019s permafrost. In places where the water ice is buried deep, microwaves could penetrate the soil and melt the ice, says NASA scientist Edwin Ethridge.<\/p>\n

The crew should also be able to produce oxygen on Mars from the carbon dioxide that makes up 95 percent of the thin Martian atmosphere. All it would take is a small amount of hydrogen, which the crew could bring. The hydrogen would react with the CO 2 to produce water, which could then be electrolyzed to make oxygen, methane, and more hydrogen. The methane could be used as fuel, and the hydrogen could be reused to produce more oxygen.<\/p>\n

Dining on a Mars voyage also poses some challenges. A 1000-day, five-person mission would require 8000 kg of food, of which about 15 percent would be packaging. NASA scientists are developing new techniques for preserving the food and reducing the packaging. Tests show that heating food to 120 \u00b0C for 2 to 3 minutes and then placing it under high pressure (about 600 megapascals) for another few minutes will kill any harmful microorganisms without damaging the food. Bombarding the food with microwaves for 5 to 10 minutes will also do the trick.<\/p>\n

Either method would increase shelf life to five years. That may sound like overkill, but getting provisions to Mars for an extended stay might mean first sending supplies aboard an unmanned shuttle, with the crewed mission following two years later, says Michele Perchonok, manager of advanced food technology at NASA. She says the space agency will soon ask for approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for its first Martian prepackaged food product: mashed potatoes.<\/p>\n

Of course, you could just dehydrate everything and then reconstitute as needed. But Zubrin advises against it. To simulate life on Mars, he has spent weeks at a time living with a small crew of scientists and students on remote Devon Island in the Canadian Arctic and in the southern Utah desert. They eat only what a Mars-bound crew would likely take with them.<\/p>\n

\u201dOur first year in the Arctic, it was all crackers,\u201d Zubrin recalls. On later visits, they brought along a lightweight electric bread maker and began serving bread, pasta, and rice. The addition of a few simple cooked items, he says, was a huge boost to the crew\u2019s morale. The crew ate together and took turns preparing meals. \u201dWe\u2019d have contests over who could cook the best meals with limited ingredients,\u201d Zubrin says.<\/p>\n

Growing food on Mars would cut down on payload weight and give astronauts a chance to munch on fresh produce. Lettuce and tomatoes, for instance, could be grown hydroponically in a greenhouse. Soybeans, wheat, peanuts, and other dried beans could be used to make pasta, bread, and cereal. But cultivating a garden, grinding flour, and cooking from scratch would all divert efforts from life-sustaining chores like finding water and repairing equipment. Salad or survival: The choice is pretty clear.<\/p>\n

So, yes, Mars is hard. Wernher von Braun knew it, and yet the planet remained ever in his sights. In his novel, he included a 62-page scientific appendix dense with tables of rocketry data, landing maneuver calculations, and hand-drawn diagrams. Getting to Mars, to von Braun, was not some fantastic dream; it was a workable, solvable problem and an engineering challenge of the best kind, because it inspires us, builds us up, and unites us as a society. He saw his book not so much as a work of fiction but as a practical guide, a road map, a way forward.<\/p>\n

\u201dIt is the vision of tomorrow which breeds the power of action,\u201d he wrote in the novel\u2019s preface. \u201dThousands of scientists and engineers are laboring constantly to perfect our knowledge of rocketry and rocket propulsion, and millions of dollars are spent yearly to advance such research. What the results will be is beyond the public ken, but they will surely exert a vital influence upon the future of the entire Earth and well beyond its present confines.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201dWhen referring to technological advances,\u201d he added, \u201dthe word \u2019impossible\u2019 must be used, if at all, with utmost caution.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Human should look above our head gazing into the stars instead of look down on the mundane Earth. Environmental protection is just an intermediate solutions that buy us more time The Earth won’t last forever. Space is the final frontier.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"lc_iscn_info":[],"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[15],"tags":[326,469,470],"class_list":["post-3086","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-_newsclips","tag-ieee-spectrum","tag-space","tag-mars"],"yoast_head":"\nMars Is Hard - \u54f2\u5b50\u6232 Philosophist\u2019s Camp<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Human should look above our head gazing into the stars instead of look down on the mundane Earth. Environmental protection is just an intermediate\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2009\/06\/12\/mars-is-hard\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mars Is Hard - \u54f2\u5b50\u6232 Philosophist\u2019s Camp\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Human should look above our head gazing into the stars instead of look down on the mundane Earth. Environmental protection is just an intermediate\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2009\/06\/12\/mars-is-hard\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"\u54f2\u5b50\u6232 Philosophist\u2019s Camp\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/horace.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/horace.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-12T08:42:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"hevangel\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@horaceorg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@horaceorg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"hevangel\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"24 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/2009\\\/06\\\/12\\\/mars-is-hard\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/2009\\\/06\\\/12\\\/mars-is-hard\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"hevangel\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c8d9e8e7a71d343b4b2c4ef4365cdb4c\"},\"headline\":\"Mars Is Hard\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-12T08:42:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/2009\\\/06\\\/12\\\/mars-is-hard\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":4823,\"commentCount\":1,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c8d9e8e7a71d343b4b2c4ef4365cdb4c\"},\"keywords\":[\"IEEE Spectrum\",\"space\",\"mars\"],\"articleSection\":[\"News Clips\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/2009\\\/06\\\/12\\\/mars-is-hard\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/2009\\\/06\\\/12\\\/mars-is-hard\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/2009\\\/06\\\/12\\\/mars-is-hard\\\/\",\"name\":\"Mars Is Hard - \u54f2\u5b50\u6232 Philosophist\u2019s Camp\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-12T08:42:57+00:00\",\"description\":\"Human should look above our head gazing into the stars instead of look down on the mundane Earth. Environmental protection is just an intermediate\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/2009\\\/06\\\/12\\\/mars-is-hard\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/2009\\\/06\\\/12\\\/mars-is-hard\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/2009\\\/06\\\/12\\\/mars-is-hard\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mars Is Hard\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"\u54f2\u5b50\u6232 Philosophist\u2019s Camp\",\"description\":\"\u860b\u679c\u65e5\u5831\u4f5c\u8005 - \u9673\u99ac\uff1a\u66f8\u8a55\uff0c\u5f71\u8a55\uff0c\u52d5\u6f2b\uff0c\u65c5\u884c\uff0c\u54f2\u5b78\u7b46\u8a18\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c8d9e8e7a71d343b4b2c4ef4365cdb4c\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\"},{\"@type\":[\"Person\",\"Organization\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c8d9e8e7a71d343b4b2c4ef4365cdb4c\",\"name\":\"hevangel\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/spocky.jpg?fit=1313%2C1259&ssl=1\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/spocky.jpg?fit=1313%2C1259&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/spocky.jpg?fit=1313%2C1259&ssl=1\",\"width\":1313,\"height\":1259,\"caption\":\"hevangel\"},\"logo\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/spocky.jpg?fit=1313%2C1259&ssl=1\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/horace.org\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/hevangel-2\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mars Is Hard - \u54f2\u5b50\u6232 Philosophist\u2019s Camp","description":"Human should look above our head gazing into the stars instead of look down on the mundane Earth. Environmental protection is just an intermediate","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2009\/06\/12\/mars-is-hard\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mars Is Hard - \u54f2\u5b50\u6232 Philosophist\u2019s Camp","og_description":"Human should look above our head gazing into the stars instead of look down on the mundane Earth. Environmental protection is just an intermediate","og_url":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2009\/06\/12\/mars-is-hard\/","og_site_name":"\u54f2\u5b50\u6232 Philosophist\u2019s Camp","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/horace.org","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/horace.org","article_published_time":"2009-06-12T08:42:57+00:00","author":"hevangel","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@horaceorg","twitter_site":"@horaceorg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"hevangel","Est. reading time":"24 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2009\/06\/12\/mars-is-hard\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2009\/06\/12\/mars-is-hard\/"},"author":{"name":"hevangel","@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c8d9e8e7a71d343b4b2c4ef4365cdb4c"},"headline":"Mars Is Hard","datePublished":"2009-06-12T08:42:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2009\/06\/12\/mars-is-hard\/"},"wordCount":4823,"commentCount":1,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c8d9e8e7a71d343b4b2c4ef4365cdb4c"},"keywords":["IEEE Spectrum","space","mars"],"articleSection":["News Clips"],"inLanguage":"en-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2009\/06\/12\/mars-is-hard\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2009\/06\/12\/mars-is-hard\/","url":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2009\/06\/12\/mars-is-hard\/","name":"Mars Is Hard - \u54f2\u5b50\u6232 Philosophist\u2019s Camp","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-12T08:42:57+00:00","description":"Human should look above our head gazing into the stars instead of look down on the mundane Earth. Environmental protection is just an intermediate","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2009\/06\/12\/mars-is-hard\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2009\/06\/12\/mars-is-hard\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2009\/06\/12\/mars-is-hard\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mars Is Hard"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/","name":"\u54f2\u5b50\u6232 Philosophist\u2019s Camp","description":"\u860b\u679c\u65e5\u5831\u4f5c\u8005 - \u9673\u99ac\uff1a\u66f8\u8a55\uff0c\u5f71\u8a55\uff0c\u52d5\u6f2b\uff0c\u65c5\u884c\uff0c\u54f2\u5b78\u7b46\u8a18","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c8d9e8e7a71d343b4b2c4ef4365cdb4c"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-CA"},{"@type":["Person","Organization"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c8d9e8e7a71d343b4b2c4ef4365cdb4c","name":"hevangel","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-CA","@id":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/spocky.jpg?fit=1313%2C1259&ssl=1","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/spocky.jpg?fit=1313%2C1259&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/spocky.jpg?fit=1313%2C1259&ssl=1","width":1313,"height":1259,"caption":"hevangel"},"logo":{"@id":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/spocky.jpg?fit=1313%2C1259&ssl=1"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.horace.org","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/horace.org"],"url":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/author\/hevangel-2\/"}]}},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pwn21-NM","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":3311,"url":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2009\/08\/06\/robots-the-expensive-way-to-prepare-cheap-food\/","url_meta":{"origin":3086,"position":0},"title":"Robots: The Expensive Way to Prepare Cheap Food","author":"hevangel","date":"August 6, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"Watch out! Minimum wage unskilled workers, there robots out there to get your low paid jobs! I wonder what will the supporters of the minimum wage say; Be a Luddite and ban robots from fast food to protect the livelihood of unskilled workers? Steven Cherry - Tue, August 04, 2009\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "News Clips"","block_context":{"text":"News Clips","link":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/category\/_reference\/_newsclips\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":110,"url":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2005\/06\/03\/the-economist\/","url_meta":{"origin":3086,"position":1},"title":"The Economist","author":"hevangel","date":"June 3, 2005","format":false,"excerpt":"Today when I was reading Economist, one of the colleague walked by cube, peaked his head and asked me what makes me read the Economist. That gets me start thinking how did I get start in this magazine. I have been known as the sole reader of the copy subscribed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Daily Scribble"","block_context":{"text":"Daily Scribble","link":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/category\/_scribble\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4012,"url":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2010\/01\/28\/the-evil-that-apple-does\/","url_meta":{"origin":3086,"position":2},"title":"The Evil That Apple Does","author":"hevangel","date":"January 28, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"If Apple has the monopoly market share like Microsoft, Apple would be an eviler company than Microsoft. A close software system kill innovation and progress. I support Google's open software model. by Steven Cherry, January 28, 2010, IEEE Spectrum Apple\u2019s new iPad is going to be a laptop supplement for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "News Clips"","block_context":{"text":"News Clips","link":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/category\/_reference\/_newsclips\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3948,"url":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2010\/01\/05\/y2k-bug-ten-years-plus-six-late\/","url_meta":{"origin":3086,"position":3},"title":"Y2K Bug Ten Years (Plus Six) Late","author":"hevangel","date":"January 5, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"It would be interesting to find out what is the bug that causes the six years difference. Maybe it is just a stupid typo. The character 6 and 0 looks quite similar if you use a very small font. By Robert Charette, Tue, January 05, 2010, IEEE Spectrum News stories\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "News Clips"","block_context":{"text":"News Clips","link":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/category\/_reference\/_newsclips\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5722,"url":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2011\/09\/23\/faster-than-a-speeding-photon\/","url_meta":{"origin":3086,"position":4},"title":"Faster Than a Speeding Photon","author":"hevangel","date":"September 23, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"Neutrino is faster than light! If there is no experimental error, it will be the biggest discovery since Einstein's relativity theory. In fact, this result prove that Einstein is wrong. If something can be faster than light, then time travel may be possible. By Rachel Courtland, IEEE Spectrum, Fri, September\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "News Clips"","block_context":{"text":"News Clips","link":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/category\/_reference\/_newsclips\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4559,"url":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2010\/06\/29\/free-the-radio-spectrum\/","url_meta":{"origin":3086,"position":5},"title":"Free the Radio Spectrum","author":"hevangel","date":"June 29, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"Free the underused radio spectrum will make our smart phone data plan much much cheaper. Imagine how much more data the cell phone company can carry in just one of those ancient inefficient TV radio channel. BY James Losey, Sascha Meinrath, IEEE Spectrum, June 2010 Antiquated regulations have made radio\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "News Clips"","block_context":{"text":"News Clips","link":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/category\/_reference\/_newsclips\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3086","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3086"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3086\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3087,"href":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3086\/revisions\/3087"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3086"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3086"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3086"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}