{"id":6463,"date":"2012-07-21T00:03:52","date_gmt":"2012-07-21T08:03:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/?p=6463"},"modified":"2012-07-21T00:03:52","modified_gmt":"2012-07-21T08:03:52","slug":"a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2012\/07\/21\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\/","title":{"rendered":"A Nerd\u2019s Perspective on Software Patents"},"content":{"rendered":"

\nSoftware patent cost more harm than good to the society allowing companies patent obvious common things. We should have a patent system that penalize those “fake” patent by imposing a heavity fine if a patent is later shown to be invalid. Part of the fine should award to the person present evidence to over turn the “fake” patent. It lessen the burden of the patent office by outsourcing the validation of patent to the crowd and it will keep those who file patents honest.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

by John Larson<\/p>\n

As a programmer doing reasonably smart stuff on the web, I\u2019m made a bit uneasy by software patents, namely because the possibility exists that I be sued for infringing upon them.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s not that I do anything nasty like meticulously reverse engineering the complex works of another for my own benefit, it\u2019s that I build websites and web applications at all. I haven\u2019t done the boatloads of research to know precisely how much I\u2019m infringing, but, for example, most projects I do contain some sort of menu, and this technically violates Microsoft\u2019s patent on \u2018system and method for providing and displaying a Web page having an embedded menu\u2019, which they have already demonstrated willingness to sue another company for. I do stuff that\u2019s WAY more complicated than a bunch of navigation links of at the top of the screen, so I can only imagine how many other toes I\u2019m stepping on when building systems that feature both ubiquitous and niche features.<\/p>\n

So this characterizes the implication of patent law upon me personally. Now then, if you scale that up to a community of hundreds of thousands of programmers similarly impacted, and throw in the rising prominence of large companies suing one another over intellectual property[1], you will then have a sense of what the fuss over software patents covers. These are broad strokes, but they convey the gist.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, protest has risen and lengthy debates have raged on about how to fix the \u201csoftware patent problem\u201d. Some of it goes on and on about legal precedent, objective tests for what\u2019s patentable, the so-called \u201ctransformation test\u201d, and other things that apt to make the eyes of a more casual reader glaze over (mine included).<\/p>\n

What I want to explore is if it makes sense and is defensible to take a completely different tack: the pragmatic view of the average, motivated nerd.<\/p>\n

Let us eschew, for a while, all the legal mumbo jumbo of definitions, specificity, precedent and so forth as they are usually applied to the debate of \u201cis X patentable?\u201d, and see if we can\u2019t go closer to the root concepts in an effort to sidestep the whole tangled mess. I want to look through the lens of the reasons and motivations of why have a patent system at all.
\nThe Essence of the Patent System<\/p>\n

I\u2019m not saying anything new or profound here, just summarizing to set the stage. The patent system is a societal construct: we all, as a society, agree to abide by certain constraints (namely not infringe upon anothers patented ideas for a fixed period of time), we willingly do this in order to reap benefits as a society, and there are consequences for an individual who breaks this agreement. (The whole thing is not unlike how we all, as a society, agree not to kill one another: we all more or less enjoy the overall benefit and are willing to give up that particular freedom, and there are consequences for an individual who breaks that agreement).<\/p>\n

There are two really great benefits we reap as a society for having and honoring the patent system.<\/p>\n

The first is that it encourages people to come up with new great things. The protection offered by patents effectively says \u201cHey, nice job coming up with that great new thing! Listen, we know you put a lot of hard work and investment into doing so, and for being the one who did all that we\u2019ll give you a window of time in which you can be the only one who gets to reap the reward of that effort, without having some copy cat come along and bootstrap off of your blood and sweat.\u201d An innovator, knowing that benefit lies on the other side is encouraged to invest time\/effort\/money up front. The rest of society gets to enjoy the fruits of that work, and for it pays the price of allowing a temporary monopoly.<\/p>\n

The second benefit is that it encourages disclosure of really smart work. In this sense, the patent system effectively says \u201cWow, that\u2019s something really smart that you did! Listen, we\u2019re thinking long term for the expansion of the fabric of human knowledge, and so we\u2019d love to know how you did that rather than see you take those secrets to the grave, or have your heirs forever keep it under lock and key. If you teach us how that works, we\u2019ll get to expand as a civilization and in return we\u2019ll make sure you have a window of time in which to benefit from your novel creation. Thanks for bettering the rest of us for the long haul.\u201d Again, a nice benefit to society: it speeds up the proliferation of ingenuity and all the fruits that come with it, gained at the cost of allowing a temporary monopoly.
\nEvaluating Patents as a Cost\/Benefit Proposition<\/p>\n

From a clear understanding of the trade-off made when a patent is given, one can view it as a transaction willingly entered into by two parties. A patent application can be viewed as a business proposal that a society might freely choose to enter into (or politely decline) according to its interests and values, much like any business deal between two free-willed entities.<\/p>\n

I propose that the debate no longer center around IF a given idea is patentable, but instead whether or not we WANT to grant a patent for a given idea: in other words, transform the debate to a value judgment as to whether we as a society care to pay the price of issuing a patent for the expected benefit, or would rather pass on the opportunity altogether. When it comes to software, I believe the best choice, as a culture, is to say \u201cthanks but no thanks\u201d to the opportunity of issuing patents, and it takes a look into the nature of software and the nerd culture that surrounds it to see clearly why.
\nNerd Culture and Innovation<\/p>\n

I love creating cool and interesting stuff with technology, and there are 100,000 others like me. There is no shortage of things out there in software that could be (or are) patented that a smart nerd with a little bit of gumption could look at and recreate without trouble. And by \u201clook at\u201d I mean simply get the view as an end user, not trolling through source code or employing sophisticated tools of reverse engineering.<\/p>\n

Consider, for example, Amazon\u2019s patent on one click ordering. When a customer is logged in, and has items in their cart, with one click they can place a completed order for those items. Kinda nifty, but anyone who\u2019s done e-commerce programming can immediately work out how to implement such a feature using a customer\u2019s information on file. I say society got a raw deal for issuing this patent: Amazon shared nothing of value with the rest of the world, and effectively earned the right squat on a generally useful idea because they ponied up some cash for lawyers and got some paperwork in first.<\/p>\n

I would categorize ideas like that as \u201cinevitable disclosure\u201d: an idea that, by its very existence in user-facing software, reveals everything needed to reproduce it. The benefit of having information about how a such an idea was implemented in software disclosed is moot: one look and (or even sometimes hearing of the idea) is all a smart nerd needs to work out the rest. Apple\u2019s patented \u201cslide to unlock\u201d widget is another example of an inevitable disclosure idea. So are rollover images:<\/p>\n

We smart nerds are always thinking of and building new stuff to razzle-dazzle, be it for the pure fun of it, personal pride and reputation, or a great portfolio piece by which to impress the next prospective client for a contracting gig. And nerd culture, with its drive to innovate and share runs much deeper than small projects. Volunteer, collaborative open source projects have created top notch, large scale innovation in all realms of software, such as full-fledged operating systems, open web standards, content management platforms, e-commerce packages, audio and video compression schemes, office productivity suites, and more.<\/p>\n

I point this all out to demonstrate a simple observation: innovation [in software] isn\u2019t going to dry up if the incentive of patent protections were to disappear tomorrow. More than most (all?) industries, software grants much more space for hobbyists and enthusiasts to get involved. The overhead to major achievement is much smaller. We are numerous, we are smart, and we are hungry to create brilliant things for both personal and altruistic reasons.
\nSecrets in Software<\/p>\n

The world of software won\u2019t turn into the wild west of pillaging and stealing ideas in the absence of software patents, because things that are genuinely hard to do and which represent painstaking work and novel innovation can be kept a secret[2].<\/p>\n

Come to think of it, the desire to file a patent to protect a software innovation may be a sign of admittance on the part of the applicant that the idea itself will be easy to replicate by a community of smart people (or even maybe your average nerd), which is a sure good reason to be disinterested in issuing a patent at all. \u201cThanks but no thanks\u201d, I would rather we collectively say as a society: \u201ckeep it to yourself because the larger world will figure out how to execute and enjoy this idea sooner or later, and get there sooner without paying the price.\u201d<\/p>\n

Notes:<\/p>\n

[1] Which breaks my heart, because as a casual observer it appears as though legal strong-arming is becoming a passable substitute for actual marketplace competitiveness.<\/p>\n

[2] Google\u2019s proprietary index and ranking algorithms that power their web search are presumably breathtakingly brilliant. They constitute a large portion of the secret sauce which gives Google its competitive edge, and they reap the rewards of that not because they came first and get to squat on medium-obvious ideas, but because they do it better than your average smart person can figure out on their own. Contrast this against Apple\u2019s slider thingee.
\nJohn Larson<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Software patent cost more harm than good to the society allowing companies patent obvious common things. We should have a patent system that penalize those “fake” patent by imposing a heavity fine if a patent is later shown to be invalid. Part of the fine should award to the person present evidence to over turn … Continue reading A Nerd\u2019s Perspective on Software Patents<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"lc_iscn_info":[],"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6463","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-_newsclips"],"yoast_head":"\nA Nerd\u2019s Perspective on Software Patents - \u54f2\u5b50\u6232 Philosophist\u2019s Camp<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Software patent cost more harm than good to the society allowing companies patent obvious common things. We should have a patent system that penalize\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2012\/07\/21\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A Nerd\u2019s Perspective on Software Patents - \u54f2\u5b50\u6232 Philosophist\u2019s Camp\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Software patent cost more harm than good to the society allowing companies patent obvious common things. We should have a patent system that penalize\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2012\/07\/21\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"\u54f2\u5b50\u6232 Philosophist\u2019s Camp\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/horace.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/horace.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-07-21T08:03:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"hevangel\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@horaceorg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@horaceorg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"hevangel\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/07\\\/21\\\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/07\\\/21\\\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"hevangel\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c8d9e8e7a71d343b4b2c4ef4365cdb4c\"},\"headline\":\"A Nerd\u2019s Perspective on Software Patents\",\"datePublished\":\"2012-07-21T08:03:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/07\\\/21\\\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1792,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c8d9e8e7a71d343b4b2c4ef4365cdb4c\"},\"articleSection\":[\"News Clips\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/07\\\/21\\\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/07\\\/21\\\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/07\\\/21\\\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\\\/\",\"name\":\"A Nerd\u2019s Perspective on Software Patents - \u54f2\u5b50\u6232 Philosophist\u2019s Camp\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-07-21T08:03:52+00:00\",\"description\":\"Software patent cost more harm than good to the society allowing companies patent obvious common things. We should have a patent system that penalize\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/07\\\/21\\\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/07\\\/21\\\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/07\\\/21\\\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A Nerd\u2019s Perspective on Software Patents\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"\u54f2\u5b50\u6232 Philosophist\u2019s Camp\",\"description\":\"\u860b\u679c\u65e5\u5831\u4f5c\u8005 - \u9673\u99ac\uff1a\u66f8\u8a55\uff0c\u5f71\u8a55\uff0c\u52d5\u6f2b\uff0c\u65c5\u884c\uff0c\u54f2\u5b78\u7b46\u8a18\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c8d9e8e7a71d343b4b2c4ef4365cdb4c\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\"},{\"@type\":[\"Person\",\"Organization\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c8d9e8e7a71d343b4b2c4ef4365cdb4c\",\"name\":\"hevangel\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/spocky.jpg?fit=1313%2C1259&ssl=1\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/spocky.jpg?fit=1313%2C1259&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/spocky.jpg?fit=1313%2C1259&ssl=1\",\"width\":1313,\"height\":1259,\"caption\":\"hevangel\"},\"logo\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/spocky.jpg?fit=1313%2C1259&ssl=1\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/horace.org\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.horace.org\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/hevangel-2\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A Nerd\u2019s Perspective on Software Patents - \u54f2\u5b50\u6232 Philosophist\u2019s Camp","description":"Software patent cost more harm than good to the society allowing companies patent obvious common things. We should have a patent system that penalize","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2012\/07\/21\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A Nerd\u2019s Perspective on Software Patents - \u54f2\u5b50\u6232 Philosophist\u2019s Camp","og_description":"Software patent cost more harm than good to the society allowing companies patent obvious common things. We should have a patent system that penalize","og_url":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2012\/07\/21\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\/","og_site_name":"\u54f2\u5b50\u6232 Philosophist\u2019s Camp","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/horace.org","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/horace.org","article_published_time":"2012-07-21T08:03:52+00:00","author":"hevangel","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@horaceorg","twitter_site":"@horaceorg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"hevangel","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2012\/07\/21\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2012\/07\/21\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\/"},"author":{"name":"hevangel","@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c8d9e8e7a71d343b4b2c4ef4365cdb4c"},"headline":"A Nerd\u2019s Perspective on Software Patents","datePublished":"2012-07-21T08:03:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2012\/07\/21\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\/"},"wordCount":1792,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c8d9e8e7a71d343b4b2c4ef4365cdb4c"},"articleSection":["News Clips"],"inLanguage":"en-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2012\/07\/21\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2012\/07\/21\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\/","url":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2012\/07\/21\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\/","name":"A Nerd\u2019s Perspective on Software Patents - \u54f2\u5b50\u6232 Philosophist\u2019s Camp","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-07-21T08:03:52+00:00","description":"Software patent cost more harm than good to the society allowing companies patent obvious common things. We should have a patent system that penalize","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2012\/07\/21\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2012\/07\/21\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2012\/07\/21\/a-nerds-perspective-on-software-patents\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A Nerd\u2019s Perspective on Software Patents"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/","name":"\u54f2\u5b50\u6232 Philosophist\u2019s Camp","description":"\u860b\u679c\u65e5\u5831\u4f5c\u8005 - \u9673\u99ac\uff1a\u66f8\u8a55\uff0c\u5f71\u8a55\uff0c\u52d5\u6f2b\uff0c\u65c5\u884c\uff0c\u54f2\u5b78\u7b46\u8a18","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c8d9e8e7a71d343b4b2c4ef4365cdb4c"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-CA"},{"@type":["Person","Organization"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c8d9e8e7a71d343b4b2c4ef4365cdb4c","name":"hevangel","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-CA","@id":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/spocky.jpg?fit=1313%2C1259&ssl=1","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/spocky.jpg?fit=1313%2C1259&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/spocky.jpg?fit=1313%2C1259&ssl=1","width":1313,"height":1259,"caption":"hevangel"},"logo":{"@id":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/spocky.jpg?fit=1313%2C1259&ssl=1"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.horace.org","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/horace.org"],"url":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/author\/hevangel-2\/"}]}},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pwn21-1Gf","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1653,"url":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2007\/12\/20\/patent-review-meeting\/","url_meta":{"origin":6463,"position":0},"title":"Patent review meeting","author":"hevangel","date":"December 20, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"Somehow I have to get up early every day this week, today is a 8a.m. patent review meeting.\u00a0 I was asked to sit in the meeting to review two verification related the patent application from Israel.\u00a0 Verification related IP is really hard to patent, it is not that we are\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Daily Scribble"","block_context":{"text":"Daily Scribble","link":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/category\/_scribble\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":43,"url":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2005\/03\/31\/legal-language\/","url_meta":{"origin":6463,"position":1},"title":"legal language","author":"hevangel","date":"March 31, 2005","format":false,"excerpt":"Tonight our project team had a team building dinner with the leaders from Saskatoon. The food and beer are great, and most important the expense is covered by PMC. In the dinner, we had talked about how expensive it is to file a patent. It costs tens of thousands of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Daily Scribble"","block_context":{"text":"Daily Scribble","link":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/category\/_scribble\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":412,"url":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2006\/05\/26\/riskopoly\/","url_meta":{"origin":6463,"position":2},"title":"Turfoploy","author":"hevangel","date":"May 26, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"My idea about combining Risk and Monopoly is getting some traction. During the lunch, my friends show great interest in this new game and we came up with many great ideas. This get me start to think about it seriously. In the afternoon, I did some research on my idea.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Daily Scribble"","block_context":{"text":"Daily Scribble","link":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/category\/_scribble\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2026,"url":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2008\/09\/20\/100-pieces-of-paper-to-get-before-you-die\/","url_meta":{"origin":6463,"position":3},"title":"100 pieces of paper to get before you die","author":"hevangel","date":"September 20, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"I am reading the news about the author of the book \"100 things to do before you die\" has passed away.\u00a0 The title of his book catch my eyes, so I went to amazon and check it out.\u00a0 The book is about 100 places, festivals and events one should see\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Daily Scribble"","block_context":{"text":"Daily Scribble","link":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/category\/_scribble\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5919,"url":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2011\/12\/07\/the-strange-birth-and-long-life-of-unix\/","url_meta":{"origin":6463,"position":4},"title":"The Strange Birth and Long Life of Unix","author":"hevangel","date":"December 7, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"Who said history is boring? This is a very interesting history of the world's most important operating system. The classic operating system turns 40, and its progeny abound By Warren Toomey, IEEE Spectrum, December 2011 They say that when one door closes on you, another opens. People generally offer this\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "News Clips"","block_context":{"text":"News Clips","link":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/category\/_reference\/_newsclips\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3108,"url":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/2009\/06\/17\/whats-mine-is-yours\/","url_meta":{"origin":6463,"position":5},"title":"What’s mine is yours","author":"hevangel","date":"June 17, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"The spirit of intellectual property law is to promote innovations, not to maximize the profit of the copyright holder. For those believe Nintendo owns the copyright of The letter M caps, such that poor little girl should not be allowed to make the caps. Do they think TV schedule is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "News Clips"","block_context":{"text":"News Clips","link":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/category\/_reference\/_newsclips\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6463","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6463"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6463\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6464,"href":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6463\/revisions\/6464"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6463"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6463"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.horace.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6463"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}