Daily Scribble

Mental Wellness

Leave a comment

Tonight I went to a talk about schizophrenia and bipolar disorder hosted by Chinese Mental Wellness Association of Canada. The association invited a UBC psychology professor to give some general information about the two mental problem. The speaker talked about the symptoms of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and corresponding treatment options. The speaker talked in English and a volunteer translate the talk to Cantonese and Mandarin in real time.

The information in the talk is very general, probably less than what is in the Wiki. But the information sinks in much better from a live presentation than reading dry text. Let alone that I probably won’t read the information on my own. Today I learned that mental problem is partly genetic and partly environmental. Mental problem can not be cured, it can only be controlled or maintained. The treatment always begins with the psychiatrist, get some pills to stabilize the problem, then consult with psychologist to work on mental therapy. The hardest part is to get the patient aware of the problem and willing to accept treatment. Many audiences asked questions relate to how to treatment the problem in the Q&A session. Too bad that I forgot to ask the speaker whether smoking will make schizophrenia worse.

In addition to the content of the talk, I have some inspiration about volunteer works. It is the first time I have first hand experience about grass root charity organization. Unlike the big volunteer program, like the Red Cross or charity run by churches, the CMWAC has a total different aura. It is more like a support group for Chinese families with mental problem. The founder and chair person also acted as the translator for the talk. Juxtaposing her side by side with the psychology professor, I can see two difference kind of volunteers. The professor is the technical expert and gives credibility to the talk. The chair person knows a lot about hands on knowledge and very enthusiastic in her volunteer work. It is not that one is better than another, but rather the kinds of two volunteers make a good complement to each other. It is like scientists and research assistants, engineers and technicians, doctor and nurses, it takes two to get the job done.

Daily Scribble

FIV

1 Comment

I just know cats can have AIDS too. I read it from a poster at the animal hospital when I take Charlie to see a vet. There is HIV for human and there is FIV (Feline immunodeficiency virus) for cats. There is about 10% of cats in North America are FIV infected FIV. Cats of FIV basically suffers the problem like human with HIV. Its immune system will stop working and it eventually dies from all sorts of diseases.

Condom can stop the spreading of HIV in human, maybe I should invent condom for cats, so the cats can have safe sex without the danger of having FIV. Then I did a little bit more research and it turns out FIV is transmitted by cat saliva, so my cat condom idea is not that useful. Or maybe I have to make a condom that’s is big enough for cat’s head.

Daily Scribble

Interrupt

2 Comments

Sometimes, you will come across task that is literally impossible to get done. You try very hard to finish the task, come up with clever (you think) solutions to work around the problem but all effort fails. Then you take a closer look at the problem and realize it really can’t be done. You can even prove it mathematically no feasible solution can ever exist. You will find yourself really stupid and wish you had spend more time analyzing the problem in the beginning instead of diving into the problem full throttle.

After spending 3 days writing several thousands lines of code that eventually have to throw away, I learn one valuable lesson: never make any attempt to create an accurate interrupt checker. It is impossible to model the exact moment when an interrupt is triggered and when it is cleared by the microprocessor.

Daily Scribble

Sponsor a child

8 Comments

I know many of my friends sponsor a child through World Vision. It only cost $35 a month to provide food, shelter, education and a hope to a poor kid in a third world country. This week Chalice, a program similar to World Vision but run by Catholic priests, come to our church for promotion. The priest display many photos of poor children from all over the world. Each photo come with a brief description of the child and a donation package. You can select a child and become his sponsor on the spot. Pat always want to sponsor a child. She picked a child in Bangladesh because he say he like playing cricket and Bangladesh is next to India. I guess she pick this child to make fun of me.

I am never very kin on signing up to become a sponsor. It’s indisputable a charity good deed so I am not against it. However, I think sponsor a child is only treating the symptom of the real problem, but will never solve it. It definitely makes a huge difference to the child you sponsor or other children share the same facility. But on a broader scale, it is just like fighting fire with a cup of a water. It is pretty much useless. The real problem is there are too many poor people in third world countries. Those poor children should not come to the world to suffer in the first place. Poor children grew up into poor adult who give birth to more poor children. We have to stop this vicious circle if we really want to fix the problem. I wanted to donate money to get things done right once for all, not just treating the symptom. Actually I tried to search for charity programs that focus on family planning in third world country, but I found none. Making poor people having less babies is a more noble deed than the charity work of feeding a few hungry mouths.

哲學

權利與法律 – PHIL320筆記

1 Comment

根據自然法的理論﹐法律賦與人民的權利﹐是基於每個人屬有的道德權利。但是每個人的道德權利並非與生俱來﹐而是建立在人的自然權利基礎之上。自然權利源於人擁有選擇的能力﹐每個人與生俱來﹐有不受別人強迫作出選擇的自由。任何人行使他的道德權利﹐其實等同於限制別人自由選擇的自然權利。只有每個人有權利某程度上限制其他人的自由﹐才能保障每個人擁有相同的自由。每一個人的道德權利﹐必定有一個相對的道德責任。不過這個不是雙向關係﹐享受別人道德責任的好處﹐並不等同擁有道德權利。

道德權利可以分為兩大類別。一般權利是自然權利的申延﹐每個人有能力自主選擇的人﹐有不受別人干預的自由的權利。特別權利是建立在自願性的特別關係之上﹐例如一個人對另一個人作出承諾﹐那前者就有履行承諾的責任﹐而後者享有以承諾限制前者自由的權利。人民參與社會契約﹐自願放棄一些自由﹐換取享受社會提供的福利﹐人民也是通過特別權利﹐去限制參與者自由﹐要他們遵守社會秩序的權利。最重要的一點﹐每個人的自然權利優先於道德權利﹐除非有合理充分的理由﹐否則以道德權力為名﹐限制他人的自然權力並不合乎道德。

道德權利優先於法律權利﹐當政府立法違反人民的道德權利時﹐人民便有反抗法律的權利。這個公民抗命的權利有兩個層面。薄權利是指人民有權違法﹐但政府仍然在道德上有權以法律懲罰違反法律的人。厚權利力則是指若果人民的道德權利受法例侵蝕﹐政府在道德上沒有懲罰違法人民的權力。注意的是訴諸良知並不等同道德權利﹐所以憑良知行為違反法律的人只有薄權利﹐政府仍然在道德上有權懲罰他們。只有在法例違反人民的道德權利時﹐如禁止言論自由或人身自由時﹐人民才有公民抗命的厚權利﹐沒有遵守不公義法律的道德責任。在厚權利下的公民抗命﹐並不會削弱法律的威嚴﹐因為削弱法律威嚴的是不乎合道德權利的惡法。

Reference:
Are There Any Natural Rights? – H.L.A. Hart
Taking Rights Seriously – Ronald Dwokin