Daily Scribble

The greatest Indian + Japanese + Canadian fusion idea.

4 Comments

We were talking about single engineers at work are having a hard timing finding girlfriends. They are distracted from work for looking for a mate, so they are not performing at their peak productivity. Here we come up with a great idea to solve this problem. Arranged marriage is popular in India. Most of my colleagues in the India office met their wives through arranged marriage. It is obvious that arrange marriage is benefits boring engineers who lacks dating skills but somewhat appealing to the parents. On other hand, Japan does not have arranged marriage, but it is common for Japanese companies match making their employees.

Maybe we can combine the two systems, the company can simply arrange marriage its single employees randomly. Now, the single guys has found their other half, they don’t have to worry about finding a wife, so they can concentrate on work. However, gay marriage is legal in Canada. In order not to discriminate against the homosexual, the company should ignore the gender difference when arranging the marriage. After all, we are an engineer firm with more male than female, we don’t have enough single female for the single male, so some guy will end up pairing up with a male wife.

Indian arranged marriage + Japanese corporate match-making + Canadian legalized gay marriage + a company full of single male engineers = ?

Daily Scribble

Health service in Vancouver

9 Comments

Canada is famous for its medicare system. It is expensive, that’s why our tax rate is so high. I never understand why it cost so much until my father in law has a surgery in the Vancouver General Hospital. The surgery is a success, the treatment is fairly good. When I visit him in the hospital, my first impression is I am in a business hotel. The decoration and finishing of the lobby does not look like the hospitals I had in mind. He got a private room for his recovery and there are more than enough nurses in the ward. He is recovering pretty fast, it is able to sit up, walk and eat within a few days. Originally, the nurse told us he can be discharged on Monday. But the hospital don’t have psychotherapist on weekend, so we have to wait until psychotherapist session on Monday. Then the nurse told us he can be discharge on Tuesday afternoon. It turns out they are still waiting for one of his lab report from a test in Tuesday morning. The report won’t come back for another day, so my father in law will have to stay in the hospital until Thursday if the nurses did not forget anything else. If the hospital could stream line the work, take the test on Sunday and arrange the psychotherapist over the weekend, then we can take him home on Monday as planned. Oh! Did I mention he got a private room? Our health system is so inefficient, no wonder it cost so much to the tax payers.

I drove all the way to VGH to pick up my father-in-law without know he can’t be discharged today. It is a total waste of my time. Maybe the hospital should learn from the airport, setup a website for the family of patients to check discharge status. Like the arrival information in the airport, you can see whether the discharge is delayed or not. Then my friend, Chris, hear my idea and joke about this idea, maybe they should add the canceled status like a flight. If the patient is canceled, you don’t have to pick him up anymore, because he is already dead. Pat said it is cruel and suggested the cancel status change to the departure gate to Heaven.

政治經濟

同性伴侶不是家庭

48 Comments

這幾天香港立法局好不熱鬧﹐因為家庭暴力條例的修訂案中﹐讓立法局議員兩面受敵﹐給同志陣營與保守宗教團體兩面夾攻﹐正是左右做人難。條例本身的內容倒沒有大爭議﹐各方面大至也同意擴大條例的保護笵圍﹐包括同性和異性同居等人。問題卻出在條例的中文譯名上﹐同志陣營堅持要保留家庭二字。宗教團體則認為把同性伴侶納入家庭笵圍中﹐是為同性婚姻合法化開綠燈﹐要求把條例家庭二字改作家居。反而條例英文名字倒沒有問題﹐domestic一字意思明確沒有爭議。

這次爭議核心的問題﹐是家庭的定義是否包括同性伴侶。同志陣營認為﹐二人以長久一起生活為目標﹐有情感或物質上的依懶性﹐就是家庭的定義。可是法律貴乎清析﹐情感關係或生活目標﹐並不是一個客觀條件﹐完全是主觀的個人意見。我們如何在法律上﹐分辨一對同性戀同居者﹐與兩個同住的室友呢﹖若果一方認為他們有感情關係﹐另一方認為他們只是普通關係﹐那條例是否適用於他們身上呢﹖所以我們必需要用一個客觀的標準作為家庭的定義。

在社會學結構論的角度來看﹐家庭是培養下一代的最重要一環。因此家庭定義的客觀標準﹐應該以血緣關係為基礎﹐以及基於血緣關係而衍生的其他關係。兩夫婦原本沒有血緣關係﹐但因為他們生兒育女﹐讓他們二人的血脈相連﹐組成一個家庭。兩婆孫同住也是家庭﹐因為他們有血脈相連﹐透過孫兒的父母把他們連接起來。換一句話說傳宗接代才是家庭的本質﹐若果沒有下一代的血脈的聯繫﹐不管兩個同居的人心理狀況如何﹐他們也只是伴侶關係﹐並不能算是組成一個家庭。我們可以視為異性同居者為婚姻的向前申延﹐他們二人以末來生育為基礎﹐現在已居住在一起的準家庭。

一來同性伴侶會引起家庭歧義的問題﹐二來同性伴侶不能生育﹐永不可能建立血緣關係。很明顯家庭的定義並不包括同性伴侶﹐因此為免條例名稱引起不必要的誤解﹐應該刪除家庭二字。

書評

浮桴記 – 鍊乙錚

2 Comments

Float 說來慚愧﹐信報老總練乙錚的名字﹐我這還是頭一次聽﹐他的文章當然也沒有看過。偶然在別人的網誌上﹐看見有關他文章的評論。說他讀數學出身﹐寫的文章邏輯性強﹐要很花精神才可以跟上他的論據推理。好奇心驅使下﹐便上網找他的文章看看有多難讀。散文評論找不到﹐卻找著了他的回憶錄《浮桴記》﹐憶述他在董建華年代當中央政策組顧問的事情。原文分十七篇於信報發表﹐後來附加多幾篇短文再錄輯成書。我看的網上版本應該是轉載報紙﹐不知與後來出書的版本有沒有出入。原本預期這本書會爆料式揪開很多政府內幕﹐細讀下來卻像一篇政治哲學論文﹐分析特區政府施政失敗的結構性原因。可能我自己平時習慣看學術論文的關係﹐練老總的文筆很容易讀﹐論點層次分明先後有序﹐比起其他不停打圈說話的作者﹐更能一矢中的說出問題精要所在。

這本書主要分三個部份﹐第一部份剖析港英殖民政府和特區政府在施政理念上的不同。他批評董建華不重視政治管理知識﹐甚至在可以沒有任何數據理論支持的情況下﹐毅然上馬推行一些急進的政策。到後來更借用民調當手段﹐讓官僚用推切統計數字﹐掩蓋如實反映社會現況的知識。以偽知識來為施政方針背書﹐得出來的成績自然焦頭爛額。他把香港政府施政大向方的問題﹐歸究於來自北京的干預﹐中央錯佔香港形勢﹐進行統戰鬥爭引起民意反彈。第二部份從政府的權力分配和角色平衡﹐指出推行問責制才是施政錯誤的另一個主因。他把原有公務員體系比喻為古代的宰相和文官﹐董建華削布政司權等同癈宰相﹐從上而下瓦解了政府推行政制的能力﹐特首再沒有辨法駕馭各自為政的部門。第三部份說些舊聞逸事﹐從側面的角度評價董建華﹐讚賞英國人留下太平紳士制度的可貴﹐最後為自己丟了顧問一職平反。他對董生的評價大慨與坊間公論差不多﹐有小材無大能的老好人﹐只是說得比較厚道點。

在董建華下台後的今天﹐練乙錚書中所說提出的結論﹐已經差不多成為香港人的常識。但在今天重看這書﹐依然可以欣賞練乙錚推論的文筆﹐以史為骨引經據典為肉﹐如何寫出叫讓人信服的政治評論。不過看完這本書後﹐我心裏倒有個問號。怎麼練乙錚在中策組那幾年的日子裏﹐好像沒有做過什麼事情。不是大材小用寫講稿﹐便是被投閒置散。偶然他寫些建議給董建華﹐總石沉大海是沒有下文。不知中策組到底有什麼用﹖看見鍊乙錚在權力中心的邊緣﹐把問題看得通透﹐也只是斷症不能醫﹐好像不能有什麼作為。莫非香港由盛轉衰是歷史中注定﹐還是要看香港人運氣﹐看中央誰來當領導人﹐看誰人會被欽點作特首﹐才能有胸襟和智慧採納練乙錚的諍言。

Daily Scribble

Media overdose

2 Comments

When I am doing something, I tends to overdose. I have a habit to write a review for all the books I read, anime, movies and TV shows I watched. I often have back-log my reviews, since it takes time for me to organize my thoughts before writing the blog entry. Somehow I found that I often back-logged reviews of the same kind. Last year, I clearly remember I had for a period of time I overdosed movies, wrote 6 movie reviews in a row. Then at another time, I overdosed animes, wrote 6 anime reviews consecutively. This time I have back-logged three book review entries and I am working on another 3 books in parallel. I am in the middle of the book cycle at the moment. It seems that when I consume one type of media, I tends to overdose until I feel guilty for having too much of it and move on to something else. Eventually after I rotate all the different medias, I will come back again and repeat the cycle. I remember a long time ago, I set my goal for a balance media diet. I mandate myself to consume at least one entry from each type of media every month. If I average out my annual media consume, I did better than the minimum requirement. However, the consumption of each media type always comes in large chunks. My media diet would be more healthy if I maintain a balance profile, or does it really matter?