Mysore – the tourist trap

Mysore Palace

Mysore is probably the only tourist destination feasible for a day trip from Bangalore, which is about 3 hours drive away. To be honest, there isn’t much to see. The Mysore Palace is the main attraction, it’s kinda neat to see how the Indian kings lived, but doesn’t worth the long journey. There are a few yet another “famous” Hindu temple on the way. Hindu temple all look the same, you see one, you see them all. Unless you worship any Hindu God, visiting more than one Hindu temple is a complete waste of time.

It turns out the side attractions are more interesting than the main ones. The Tipu Sultan’s Summer Palace is a small museum about the last king of Indian and his defeat by the British. The exhibition is alright, just some history about an uninteresting king. However the Summer Palace itself is kinda neat, sitting in the middle of a beautiful garden. It looks like a very modern building with glass wall from the front gate. However when we come close, the glass wall turns out to be wooden panels painted in green!

Tipu Sultan's summer palace.  From afar, it looks like a modern building with glass wall... Up close, the wall is actually wooden panel in green.

The other attraction worth seeing is the Rail Museum. It has 5 engines and a royal cart in exhibition. It doesn’t charge tourist 10x entrance fee. It has no hawkers or annoying tourist guides. Apparently it is not a popular tourist spot, a photographer ask us to pose in front of the trains so that the government tourist book can show foreigners also interest in visiting this museum. We enjoy a quiet and educational walk between the trains and tracks. The restore work is not done very well , but I will take the Rail Museum over any Hindu temple any day.

A huge steam engine The control room

Muslim

In yesterday afternoon tea break time, I have a very interesting conversation at work about Muslim. I have a Chinese (myself), a white guy (Mark) and an Indian (Ron) in the chat, representing pretty much the three main culture view in the world except the Muslim’s. The nature of Muslim has always been a question roaming in my head. Is Muslim a peaceful religion as they claim or are they fundamentally evil? India has many Muslim, Ron has a lot more experience working and living with Muslim than us. Mark is a typical white Christian with a liberal mind. He reads quite a lot in the culture conflict issues. Together with my usual curious out of the box ideas and interest in religion issues, we have come to some very interesting insight in the discussion.

We are debating whether Muslim is a religion of violence and intolerance. It is fair for a religion trying to convert other people. Using Indian as an example, when British came to India, they built schools, ran hospitals, trying to lure in the believers. When the Muslim king ruled India, they simply put a knife on your neck and forced you to convert. We concludes that poverty is major cause of terrorist, but the Muslim believe definitely fueled the attacks. Is it much more easy to recruit terrorists if they believe violence act leads to heaven and there are 72 virgins waiting there. It is quite interesting to explain why Muslim is violence though. Muslim is a younger religion than Christianity. Today’s Muslim is very similar to the Church in middle age. Maybe Muslim is just on the nature evolution religion, experience the stage of violence and rebellious before maturing to be religion of love an peace like Christianity. If Muslim really is the biggest thread to mankind after Nazism and Communism, none of us can provide any satisfying solution.

One thing that we all come to conclusion unanimously is the loud speakers of the mosque is very very annoying. They bust prayer songs in high volume before dawn waking up everyone who is trying to get a good sleep. I guess the Mosque right outside of the guest house provide sufficient evidence to rule Muslim is a evil, if not stupid, religion. By definition, anyone who disturbs my sleep deem to be evil.

兄弟

兄弟 看「兄弟」 完全是因為被它的星級演員陣容吸引﹐無線五虎將四缺一﹐搭單奉送陳奕迅﹐心想應該很的號召力吧。不過這齣電影是純男人戲﹐女角只是可有可無的花瓶﹐不過反正賣點是黑社會江湖仇殺﹐夾硬加插愛情線反而古怪﹐沒有女角的戲份倒是可以接受。「兄弟」的演員陣容很八十年代﹐題材也很八十年代﹐有點懷疑這套戲是否遲了二十年才上映。

主角是苗喬偉和陳奕迅﹐哥哥是經營家族生意的社團大佬﹐弟弟則是不問江湖事長居外國。湯鎮業飾演反派﹐處心積慮搶奪社團話事人的寶座。黃日華當苗喬偉的義弟兼保鐮﹐可惜身裁短小的他﹐架起墨鏡穿上長褸﹐怎樣也當不成Mark哥。影帝劉德華則慘變路人﹐飾演跟著其他人團團轉的反黑組督察。故事是很典型的黑社會橋段﹐社團大佬的退隱江湖的老父被殺﹐哥哥急召弟弟回港展開復仇大計。你殺我﹐我又殺你﹐殺來殺去﹐最後全部人死清光完場。

苗喬偉一心練訓陳奕迅當接班人﹐與陳奕迅起初抗拒黑社會的做事手法 ﹐到被捲入殺生危機後暴走大反撲﹐原本應該是全劇的重心所在。可惜四大影星不論如何傾力演出﹐也堆砌不起牽絆兩人的那份張力。哥哥是個絕了種的上一代大佬﹐那份守舊思想是常廿一世紀的新黑社電影諷刺。弟弟則是很天真很傻﹐還以為他從外國回來﹐會起用營商手法去改革社團﹐與守舊的哥哥擦出火花。可是劇中他完全處於被動﹐不是給哥哥擺佈便是顧著逃命。反倒是奸雄湯鎮業展現出大將之風﹐反對父親刺殺大佬老父的計劃﹐認為殺過退休老人是無用的小動作﹐倒不如光明正大打倒大佬奪權。輪到自己老父被殺一命填一命﹐還可以冷靜尋找對自己最有利的出路﹐與大佬講數平分社團話事人的權力。

槍戰是黑社會電影不可缺少是場面﹐可是當社團大佬要拿起手槍親自出馬的時候﹐就等於打仗時司令要開槍自衛一樣﹐這個社團經已大勢已去﹐無人可用淪落到大佬也要幹骯髒事。說起來苗喬偉堂堂一個社團大佬﹐怎麼戲中好像完全不見手下的蹤影﹐難道他經營的真是家族生意﹐只有家臣小貓三數隻。

為何在有百多套電影的星航娛樂系統中﹐我竟然會選擇看這套很老土很爛的電影呢﹖雖然不用錢買飛也不用花寬頻下載﹐可是也損失了觀看其他好電影的時間機會成本啊﹗

National Treasure 驚天奪寶

National Treasure 今次從溫哥華去印度工幹我學精了﹐不再乘搭飛機舊沒有私人電視的德航﹐改坐被譽為最佳服務航空公司的星航。星航不單膳食好坐位闊﹐最叫人驚喜的是個人娛樂系統。每個座位擁有個人電視是長途客機的最低要求。星航的個人電視內置超過一百套電影和百多套電視劇集﹐選擇多得讓人不知應該看什麼才好。原本我打算看首輪猛片「驚天奪寶第二集」﹐不過翻查電影目錄時﹐發現星航很細心地同時提供第一集﹐好讓我這些沒有看過第一集的人不會無所適。心想反正沒有看過第一集﹐不如先看第一集再看續集吧。

論娛樂性「驚天奪寶」十分豐富﹐上天落地大爆炸偷地圖一應俱全。不過相比奪寶電影中的經典﹐史蒂芬史匹堡的「奪寶奇兵」系列﹐這電影拍馬也不追不上。不過若不介意看一班人走來走去﹐扮作很驚險刺激地去尋寶的話﹐倒可以拿來消磨二個小時。故事很簡單真線﹐主角Nicolas Cage有個祖傳秘密﹐關於聖殿騎士的失落寶藏。相傳該寶藏輾轉落入美國國父華盛頓手上﹐他與其他開國元腦把寶藏收起來﹐在不同的美國像徵上留下線索讓後人追尋。電影就是看著主角把謎題一個接一個解開﹐從祖父聽來的一句說話開始﹐穿洲過省一慢慢追屋線索﹐就像玩野外定向一樣。

觀眾不需要理會謎題的設計﹐因為主角總可以在三言兩語間揭開所有謎底。其實那些謎題的兒戲的程度﹐連大學生玩的野外定向也不如﹐枉論要在電影內表演鬥智鬥力了。像電影那般製造一個接一個的線索﹐作為通往寶藏的道路﹐是最不切實際的埋寶方法。只要其中一環意外地斷了﹐寶藏就會永不能重見天日。若要繪畫藏寶地圖 ﹐最好的辨法是用密碼加密﹐只要擁有正確解碼﹐才可以環原出寶藏的位置。地圖副本不妨大量複制﹐反正不知道密碼﹐拿到地圖也得物無所用。至於有關謎題的其他毛病實在太多﹐要批評也不知應該從何入手﹐只好暫且放它一馬。

歷史中的寶藏不外是古代皇帝的陪葬品﹐遇難沉沒的運寶船﹐迷失途中了的運寶隊伍。古代海盜會埋藏搶回來的寶物﹐不過那也只是暫時性的措施﹐待有機會便會回去把寶藏掘出來享用。根本不會有人像電影描述那樣﹐刻意把一個大寶藏永久埋起來。寶藏與金錢一樣本身沒有任何價值﹐只有古代文物的文化價值。寶藏的價值在於拿來換取可以享用的物件或服務。永久把寶物埋起來不打算用﹐寶物的價值等於零﹐倒不如把寶物毀掉算了﹐至少不用擔心落入別人手上。不論是多麼龐大的寶物﹐基本上也只是等同增加貨幣供應﹐對國家的財政不會有正面影響。副作用是能夠大量地輸入外來貨品﹐做成通貨膨漲﹐間接趕絕國內的生產商﹐讓國家經濟一缺不振。總言而之﹐「驚天奪寶」的尋寶遊戲有最基本的問題﹐是沒法可醫的死症。倒不如說主角一行人解開謎底走到藏寶室﹐發現只有一張華盛頓寫的字條﹐說根本沒有世紀寶藏﹐一切只是他一時慶起作出玩弄後人的大整蠱。這樣的結局說不定比電影原本的結局更合理呢。

Visiting Taj Mahal

Taj Mahal

If you are visiting India, Taj Mahal is the one thing you have to visit. Without seeing Taj Mahal, you can’t say you have been to India. The last weekend is Indian new year, so we get a four days long weekend. I had arranged a trip to see Taj Mahal with Mark, my other colleague who had exiled to Bangalore from Vancouver with me.

Taj Mahal is located in Arga in Northern India. We have to take a flight to New Delhi first then take a 3 hour express train ride to Arga. Since our flight arrive in New Delhi at night, so we stay there for the first night. The plane is delayed as usual and it took us a while to find the driver coming to pick us up. By the time we get to the hotel, it’s already 1a.m. Our train is 6a.m. the next morning, so we only get 4 hours of sleep.

Travel by train in India is quite an adventure. You see all the things you expected to see from the Discovery Channel. People waiting for over night train just sleep in front of the ticket office. The platform is crowded, with people trying to sell you everything form food to souvenirs. Wild dogs running between the rails and the platforms, looking for food in the garbage. Local people are carrying luggages on their head. In the train, the second class cabin for Indians are packed and stinky. Luckily we are staying in the first class cabin with AC. Put it this way, the condition in first class cabin better but still far from good, probably in par with the condition of buses in Vancouver.

We are staying in Arga for a night. On the first day, we visited Taj Mahal and the Arga Fort. Taj Mahal really lives up to its fame as one of the seven wonders in the world. It is very beautiful. I will save my words to describe how impressive it is, please just check out my photos in facebook. Local people pay Rs20 entry fee, tourists pay Rs750. It would be nice if everyone pays the same price, prefer at Rs750, so the Taj Mahal would be less crowded. The tourist guide we had on the first day is very good, he told us stories about Taj Mahal and helped us take good pictures.

According to the tourist book, Taj Mahal is the symbol of love for a king to memorize his dead wife. I think it is just an excuse for the king to build himself an expensive toy. The king wanted to build a black Taj Mahal in black mable facing the Taj Mahal, but he bankrupted his kingdom with just one Taj Mahal and got overthrown by another king. There are some annoying hawkers in Taj Mahal or any historical site I went in India. They will try to sell you the perfect angle to shoot a photo of Taj Mahal and ask you Rs10 for each position. One word you only have to say is NO. Don’t even bother talk to refuse them politely, those hawkers don’t understand any English word others than NO.

In the afternoon we went to see the Arga Fort. The Taj Mahal is the tomb for the queen and the Arga Fort is where the king lives. It is built using red sand stones overseeing the Taj Mahal. It is quite impressive on its own, but we had just saw Taj Mahal. The beauty of Taj Mahal just eclipse all other historical sites we are seeing in the trip. In short, the Arga Fort is just a huge ruin of an ancient palace. You get exactly what you expected form all palace ruins. The ancient air conditioning system in the palace is one of the few things interests me. The building is built using hallowed marble wall filled with water and sitting on top of a huge water pond. The water and marble keeps the building cool in the summer.

On the second day, we took a side trip to Fatehpur Sikri, yet another ancient palace / fort ruin. It is about 1.5 hours drive from Arga. The ruin itself is nothing special but the view of Indian country side on the way is quite beautiful. At least I don’t see garbage everyone in the country side like in the city. The tour guide we have in the second day is really bad. No only he talked on his cell phone all the time. He did not wait for slow walkers like me, I have to run to catch up with him a few times. He deliberately bring us to hawkers trying to sell us useless junks, and worse he try to persuade us buying the junks.

The tour guide from the first day at least did his job to warn us staying away from the hawkers. To be fair, the first tour guide also brought us to some handcrafts shops charging marked up tourist price, but we know it is part of the deal. Trying to sell us junks is not the job of a tour guide. It is totally unacceptable. I suggested we only tip the second tour guide only Rs100, but Mark is kind enough to tip him Rs200 and he regretted it once he handed out the money. From now on, I will not tip any Indian tour guide if his service is unacceptable. Talking on the cell phone more than 30 seconds, didn’t wait for me and trying to sell me junks equals to no tips! On the other hand, we should reward good service. We tipped the first tour guide quite handsomely. We even got his business card and will highly recommend him to others planning to visit Taj Mahal.

One other thing we learn is the driver is usually more reliable than tour guide. We have some time between the end of our tour and the our train back to New Delhi. We asked the driver take us to the government shop and a good restaurant for beer. He dutifully follow our orders and bring us to a decent restaurant. Unlike the tour guide, the driver probably don’t have any commission from the shops or restaurants, so he will simply bring you to the one he thinks is the best. On our train back to New Delhi, we sit next to a philosophy professor from Britain. Her field of expertise is the moral theory of David Hume. I really enjoy our conversation ranging from philosophy to almost anything.

We spent the last day in New Delhi. We got a tour guide to show us around the city and unfortunately we got a bad tour guide again. Anyways, there ain’t much too see. The museums and monuments are closed on every Monday, so I didn’t get to visit Gandhi. I am a bit disappointed not about to take a photo with his statute and posing like him. We visited two more ruins, Qutb Minar and Humayun’s Tomb. Qutb Minar is dating 1000 years old and have a tower 72 meters high. I am not interested in Indian history and we are not allow to go up the tower, so it is not very impressive. The Humayun’s Tomb looks pretty similar to Taj Mahal and it is 100 years older. It has a marble dome but the main structure is built using red sand stone. The garden is quiet and beautiful, but not as grand as the one at Taj Mahal.  I guess Humayun’s Tomb is simply a cheap prototype for Taj Mahal.

One thing I am like about New Delhi is its city planning and government buildings. The roads are wide and well designed. The architecture of government buildings are Victorian style with Indian flavors. New Delhi is probably the capital with the most impressive center of authority district. Well… all those nice things are remains from the colonial days. The British pretty much built and design New Delhi from scratch in the 1920s. Once you go outside of the British planned section of the city, New Delhi is just like every other Indian cities. Looking at the nice left over form British ruling days and the current of the Indian government. I wonder the independence really did any good to the Indians. One way or another, the Indian people are oppressed by the government, whether it is a foreign rule or domestic one. However, the life of the people would be better if the oppressing government is at least more capable.