The Firm – John Grisham

The Firm 廣東俗語有句說話﹕邊有咁大隻蛤乸隨街跳。接受超出合理水平的條件前﹐先要讀清楚每一行細字﹐因為這些優厚的條件背後﹐極有可能暗藏殺機。一個有三數份華爾街紐約著名律師行聘書在手的法律系異業生﹐接到美國南部一間小律師樓的面試。開出超越常理的優厚條件﹐底薪高出外面二成﹐入職送寶馬名車免費房屋貸款﹐大慨任誰也扺受不了這個誘惑。可是平靚的海面低下卻急流暗湧﹐小律師上班才第一天﹐就律師行兩位律師給人謀殺。他才發現這間四十人的律師行﹐竟然在過去五年間有五名律師死亡﹐工作死亡率比當油井礦工還差。他還被聯邦調查局的探員釘上了﹐家中辨公室車子給不知何方神勝裝上了竊聽器﹐生活受到二十四小時的嚴密監控。工作上要求他每星期上班八十小時﹐他因冷落妻子家令庭關係同樣陷入危機。到底他踏進了什麼危險地方﹐如何可以保住小命逃出這個「糖衣陷阱」呢﹖

「糖衣陷阱」是John Grisham的第二本小說也是他的成名作﹐讓他坐上了法律驚險小說的第一把交椅﹐成為全美國唯一兩個初版銷量過百萬本的其中一人(另一個初版銷過百萬本的作家是寫侏羅紀公園的Michael Crichton)。任何暢銷名著也逃不出給荷里活改篇的命運﹐ 「糖衣陷阱」的電影版由湯告魯斯主演。當年的他還是很靚仔有型﹐不像是今天信了邪教變得行為怪異。我印象中好像多年前看這套電影﹐不過細節差不多全忘記了。我以前一向不閱讀這類律師小說﹐不是特別抗拒也不是不喜歡﹐只是科幻小說看起來比較吸引﹐時間有效只好作出取捨。今次我只是在朋友家等吃飯時看見﹐記起湯告魯斯那套電影﹐隨手起來掀了幾頁﹐結果一發不可收捨﹐非要把小說拿回家讀完結局不可。我大慨知道這類小說的公式﹐主角身邊必定有個大險謀等著他。主角因為好奇比想把律師行的秘密查過水落石出而身陷險境﹐讀者也是因為好奇心不停追讀下去﹐看看主角如何化險為夷。小說的作者曾當律師﹐描寫律師生涯的筆觸十分傳神﹐娓娓道出初入行律師的辛酸﹐以及法律界光輝背後的陰暗面。

我用了一星期時間把小說看完﹐頭兩天馬不停蹄先看了半本﹐剩下的半部則攤長來看。後半部雖然依然寫得精彩﹐可能 是我隱約記得結局﹐沒有追看的迫切性﹐才放慢了閱讀的步划。反正也是例牌大團圓結局﹐好人沒事財色兼收﹐壞人則難逃法網。故事的主線是主角那間律師行其實是黑手黨名下的生意﹐表面上看似在替合法公司投資避稅﹐實際上是黑手黨的專業洗錢機器。律師行聘請身無分文的窮畢業生﹐指定要聘請已結婚的人﹐提供經濟誘因鼓勵他們落地生根開枝散葉﹐讓他們不能輕易離職脫身。新入職的律師最初只處理合法生意﹐到了時機成熟就會向他們招手加入犯罪集團。一方面用優厚的薪金吸引他們幹非法勾當﹐另一方面用妻兒子女的安全防止他們產生異心。過去幾個慘遭不幸的律師﹐就是因為想向警方告密而遭殺人滅口。今次我們的主角憑著機智和膽色﹐在律師行搜集犯罪證據﹐交給警察將犯人繩之於法。小說中的主角看似是身不由己﹐聯邦調查局迫他當二五仔﹐黑手黨因為他背叛而下追殺令﹐最後他才要夾著巨款逃亡海外。但想深一層這驚險橋段有點夾硬造作﹐其實主角的大可以光明正大的洗手不幹。他才剛剛入職沒有接觸過非法交易﹐清清白白不怕聯邦調查局告。他亦沒有任何內幕資料﹐辭職不幹也不會受到追殺﹐反正黑手黨也打算精簡人手﹐炒掉其他不知情的新律師。殺人不是一件便宜的事﹐根本不值得花錢在對黑手黨有任何威脅的人身上。不知主角太過好奇踩到了別人的禁忌﹐還是他太過貪心不捨得高薪厚職﹐才是讓他一步步泥足深陷﹐最後弄至要狼狽逃忘的田地呢﹖

Garage Sales

Today Pat is having a garage sales, a real garage sales that the stuffs is displayed inside a garage. We have been preparing it for the whole week, unpacking the stuffs, cleaning the items and placing them neatly. There are two garages full of stuffs Pat has to get rid of after she moved. We placed classifies on the local newspaper. I am surprised by the number of people come and buy stuff today. We were busy for the whole morning. Some people even come as early as 8a.m., try to get some good deals so that they can resell the goodies later at flea market. You can never imagine what people will buy. Something that you think is a piece of junk can sold for a few bucks. There was a fat middle age man the scoop the old super Nintendo machine with all the games with joy. If he want to play good games, why don’t he go out and get a Wii instead? If he want to play the old games, he can download them for free from the internet and play it using an emulator.

Like in the supermarket, the placement of the items are very important in the garage sales. When people first came in, they will take a glance of everything. If they spot something they like, only then they will proceed to look a little bit closer. Things sitting at the back of the garage having no one interested for 2 hours and it is gone the moment I move it outside to be displayed under sun. There is also a different kind of buyers, there was a pair of old folks treasure hunt from the piles for almost an hour.

At the end they bought quite some stuff. I get bargain stuffs and chatting with people in garage sales enlightened their Saturday morning. We have sold over half of the stuffs today. Hopefully, the other half will go away tomorrow, so it saves me time from taking the junk to the dump. People come over and pay you money to take away the junks for you. Garage sales is truly wonderful.

Gun legislation

Tonight I discuss the gun legislation with a friend during dinner.  He against the citizen are allow to own hand guns, and I take the default libertarian position to support citizen’s freedom to own guns.  He initial argument is hand gun has no practical use, is dangerous and induce damage to things.  I don’t want to use the self defense argument, so I try to counter his arguments one by one.  I use the example of Ferreira racing car to demonstrate no practical use is not a necessary condition to make something illegal.  Then I use archery to  demonstrate something is dangerous in the wrong hands cannot justify the take it away from law binding citizens.  Causing damage to things per se is nothing wrong, except when you start shooting irresponsibly.  However, my friend made a very good point, hand gun is has all these three properties combined, only katana or medieval swords falls in this category to a certain extend.  Then the discuss shifted to where to draw the line marking what’s legal and what’s not.  Fully automatic and high power amour piercing guns is already illegal.  Why should we extend the coverage to hand guns or even rifles but not katana?  Who has the authority to draw this line?  Should we simply use majority rules, so that the minority has to follow the majority regardless of their moral argument?  I don’t have a good answer other than the plain old libertarian argument to support allowing citizens to guns.  Maybe I will think a bit hard to justify the cause when I got my firearm license.

寫意人生 – 工程師的愛情理論

Leisure Life 近年鄭嘉穎晉身無線的當紅小生﹐差不多每套的都市愛情劇也是由他當男主角。從與他做對手戲的女主角的卡士﹐可以看出他的星途一帆風順。最初他只分配到新人周麗琪﹐劇集叫好叫座﹐他升級到過氣視后陳松玲。收視再下一城﹐他卒之可以在「寫意人生」中﹐與視后黎姿在熒幕上談情說愛。由「天幕下的戀人」開始﹐他的劇集每套的劇情都大同小異﹐公式地與女主角相遇﹐由鬥氣吵嘴到拍拖熱戀﹐中間舊女友出場引起誤會﹐以至情海翻起茶杯裏的小風波﹐最後必然是男主角的痴心感動女主角﹐贏得美人歸大團員結局。每套劇集不同的地方﹐就只是換個女主角﹐把他們放在新的工作環境﹐然後從無線劇本庫中按方執藥﹐把圍繞主角家人朋友的預設副線湊合起來﹐那就大功告成一個新劇集。

這套劇集主題是說都市人生活忙碌﹐要慢下來過寫意人生的反思﹐所以劇本的節奏很緩慢﹐幾乎給悶死了。家人朋友的副線劇情很無聊﹐沒有主角的場面﹐我差不多是全部也用快鏡跳看﹐四個半小時看十集﹐破了個人看電視的最快記錄。黎姿笑起來很甜很耐看﹐可是演出平平無奇﹐完全突出不到女主角應有的藝術氣質﹐甚至連應有的國學修養也欠奉。那我為什麼竟然會畢全套劇集呢﹖ 相信是因為這是無線有史以來﹐第一次把男主角設定為電腦人。 在劇中鄭嘉穎飾演一個軟件工程司﹐撇除例牌的辦公室政治橋段﹐編劇竟然能夠如實反映高科技公司的上班生活。電腦人工作日夜顛倒﹐咖啡零食是不可缺少的精神支柱。整個團隊不是一起困在電腦前除蟲趕死線﹐就是困在會議室開腦震蕩大會﹐搞盡腦汁想新產品功能。最後幾經艱辛計劃在限期完成﹐上司對技術細節完全沒有興趣知道﹐反對市場部營銷見客的吹水癈話點頭稱讚。讓我這個工程師不禁產生共鳴﹐就算故事幾悶拖得幾慢也要死撐看下去。不過編劇最成功之處﹐就是刻劃出電腦人與別不同的愛情觀。凡事也以客觀理性作出判斷﹐在感情方便的觸覺毫不發達。加上由鄭嘉穎這個讀土木工程的正牌工程師演譯﹐讓我邊看邊有著他鄉遇故知的喜悅。

在其他劇集中男主角送禮物給女主角時﹐那份禮物總是很巧合地合乎女主角心意。鄭嘉穎在劇中要買生日禮物給女朋友﹐卻想破腦袋也想不到買什麼才好﹐幸好最後黎姿用女性的視角替他解決問題。工程師最怕是賣禮物給女朋友﹐衣服飾物等要依靠主觀判斷美醜的東西不懂得買﹐花心思去揀了一件也一定不合心水。可以比較規格功效懂得買的東西﹐卻全部都是不適合送給女朋友﹐毫不浪漫的男人玩意。劇中鄭嘉穎替黎姿揀的Mini Copper除外﹐大慨車子是唯一一樣工程司不會買錯給女朋友的禮物。若果現實生活像劇中一樣﹐有個小師妹可以幫忙出主意﹐不用傷腦筋多好呢。

無線劇集的感情線﹐不外是一男多女或一女多男﹐拖拖拉拉的糾纏不休﹐讓觀眾看得煩厭﹐想叫他們快些買定離手﹐一人揀一個完場收工。劇中鄭嘉穎身邊也有好幾位女性角色﹐可是他對愛情從來不會猶疑不決﹐愛就愛﹐不愛就不愛﹐專一決斷。在與舊女朋友靠視像拍拖時﹐他對黎姿很好很關心她﹐但完全沒有追求的意思﹐只是對小師妹的衷心關懷﹐甚至介紹她給女朋友認識。後來他與黎姿走在一起﹐他對Chesta與女上司江總也同樣關心﹐不過就難免黎姿會胡思亂想了。大慨他認自己行得正企得正﹐與其他女性朋友清清白白﹐沒有需要亦不懂得去避嫌吧。在最後幾集﹐舊女朋友回來找鄭嘉穎﹐希望懺悔復合。從來沒有無記的男主角像鄭嘉穎那樣絕情﹐見也不見聽也不聽﹐反而黎姿過意不去叫鄭嘉穎去理理她。工程師的愛情感百份百理性﹐好像電腦邏輯中的一與零﹐有就有﹐沒有就沒有﹐何時何地也清清楚楚。當愛情過去時﹐就像拍一聲閂掉開關掣一樣﹐不會再有絲毫留戀。

我覺得整套戲最精彩的一段﹐是鄭嘉穎和黎姿在天台談心﹐講他的經濟愛情理論﹐用opportunity cost去解釋他為什麼對女朋友專一。(可惜無記字幕組不材﹐竟然譯錯了機會成本一詞) 不過經濟愛情理論對黎姿和大部份女人來說﹐也是對牛彈琴不能理解明白其中真諦。黎姿回敬一堆似是擬非的所謂感性愛情觀﹐看鄭嘉穎的表情大半是心理萬分不認同。最後黎姿贈他半首蘇東坡的江城子﹐幸好他有讀過這首詩可以接到下句﹐背得出精讀本中說的意境才勉強過關。

這套劇集還有很多關於工程司的傳神描述﹐分散在劇中各處鄭嘉穎出場的戲份﹐不能一一盡錄。誠意推薦「寫意人生」給當工程師的你﹐或是有個當工程師男朋友的妳﹐保證一邊看一邊定會發出會心微笑。記緊沉悶的地方要用快鏡跳看﹐不然真的難挨足二十集啊。

Outsourcing

Outsourcing is nothing new to the high-tech industry.  My company is working on the feasibility for the next project and due to the high development cost, the executive wants to explore outsourcing to save some money.  In previous projects, we had good and bad experience with the folks in Indian, mostly bad experience though.  If cost cutting is the only reason for outsourcing, why don’t we outsource the executives instead of the engineers?  They are the biggest expenses and probably the most useless in running the company.  The company does not have any direction for almost a year, we are working on the same old slowly dying product lines, try to milk as much as possible before the reveue disappears.  That’s a no brainer’s job, even a MBA student can do it right.  I am sure the executives in India or China are as component as our executives, probably better.  Just look at the stock price of the Chinese or Indian firms comparing to the stock price of my company, we should know which executives have vision and know how to execute the plan well.  After outsourcing the workers, research and development, the latest trend in outsourcing is the executives.  Actually that make sense if we use Marxist view to analysis how a company runs.  Traditional view is the executives hire workers to work for him, but we can also flip the equation so that the executives are just management professionals hired by the workers collectively to run the company efficient.  Either way, they are the overhead feeding on the productivity of the workers.  If they can’t produce the strategy and vision to direct the company to the right direction, they are just waste the productivity of the workers and they should be replaced.