Internet discussion

Internet discussion is very different from face to face discussion.  I have been activitly discussing various issues ranging from politics, economy, environmental protection, animal rights, religion and philosophy in internet for many years.  I found that internet discussion is more in depth.  You can rarely drill on a controversial yet serious issues in face to face discussion.  When you are talking to friends, you phase those issues in a light way to avoid hard feelings.  Talking to someone oppose to your idea make your idea crystallize in your mind.  When you are force to defend your argument, you will have a much better understanding of the issues, so that you can make a better judgement.

Internet discussion is like debating club in school, you can find opponents who defense their view to their last breath.  Unlike school debate, you can choose your side in internet.  You can argue for or against what you truly believe in.  Like in a debate, you are not try to convince your opponent, because people usually won’t admit they are wrong.  You try to convince the by standers who are following the discussion, although you may never find out whom you have influenced.  Unlike debate, there is no judge to determine who win or who lose the debate.  You are the only judge in an internet disscusion.  Although you may not admit you had lost, but you will remember the defeat and vow not to make the same mistake again.  This is a learning process make your argument stronger next time.

Maybe someone say internet discussion is a waste of time.  In some way, it’s a waste of time.  Thinking and arguing about those serious issues is a waste of time.  Time is better spent on making more money then use the money to enjoy life.  Who cares about those serious issues?

Election

No, I am not talking about the US election.  I am talking about the Canadian election.  Something I like about the Canadian political system is the election will not drag on too long.  From the moment the government announce the election, there is only one month before it actually take place.  So we will not bored by the ever lasting election campaign like in the US.  I wonder what’s the point of having pro-long election campaign?  Isn’t that most voter already make up their mind?  The political view of a party won’t change over night, voters should be well aware of what they expect to get from each party.  The candidate themselves are irrelevant, all politicians cannot be trust anyways.  Whatever they promise you in the campaign are lip service.  As long as there the politicians do not make any stupid mistake or involve in any scandals, the voters are pretty much voting for the party.

I used to vote for the Liberal in the past elections.  This time, I will switch to the Conservative, since it is the only party that is not anti-gun.  If I want to keep my toys, I better vote for them.  Other than this factor, the agenda of the other parties are pretty much loads of shit.  The Green Party is a joke, their policy does not make any economical sense.  The Quebecois is really a provincial party, their sole agenda is the independence of Quebec.  Only stupid Quebec people will vote for them.  There are three major party, Conservative on the right, New Democratic Party on the left and Liberal in the middle.  I never buy policy from the left, they always want to raise tax.  The Liberal suppose to be ok, but this time they dig themselves in a big hole by proposing carbon tax.  Tax increase is bad, period.  The Conservative seems to have the best policy with the usual small government and tax cut agenda.  I really admire the Conservative refuse to please the arts and culture group by denying them more money.  The reason is very libertariain, arts and culture are personal perference, the government should not spend tax payers’ money activities that most citizens don’t really care.  They make a very good point stating that those who really care about arts and culture, should just donate to their favorate arts or culture group.  It is unfair asking the general public to pay for their perference.  This kind of sound fiancial policy really win me over as a support for the Conservative Party.

Life After People 人類消失後的世界

Life After People 我一直以為歷史頻道只會播歷史節目﹐想不到也會製作這套關於未來的《人類消失後的世界》。雖然好節目不分在那個頻道播也是好節目﹐但我認為這個節目的性質比較適合Discovery Channel。 顧名思義這個節目是講述一旦人類滅望﹐地球會發生什麼樣的變化﹐至於人類絕種的原因則不在討論笵圍。當然如果人類真的絕種﹐到時也沒有人來關心地球的問題﹐亦沒有人去覆核節目的預測是否準確。節目訪問很多科學家﹐亦考證局部地區性人類絕跡的例子﹐結論雖然不一定百份百準確﹐但也應該相差不遠矣。

現在人類還未絕種﹐當然不可能實景到拍攝人類絕種後的情況。這個節目除了旁述講解資料外﹐還用大量電腦動畫模疑未來的景像。這套紀錄片雖然講未日﹐但完全沒有恐怖的感覺﹐反而很重教育電視的味道﹐純萃講解科學知識和理論。人類消失後不過短短幾十年﹐城市變已經變得面目全非﹐沒有人類的維修﹐路道很快被草叢和森林覆蓋。人類飼養的寵物退化為野生動物﹐郊外的動物進佔市城﹐街道變成猛獸的守獵場。讓觀眾震撼不是電腦加工的未來畫面﹐而是現實中真正發生的例子。當年蘇聯切諾貝爾核電廠發生意外﹐方圓數百里變為死城﹐不過短短的二十年時間﹐在幅射污染區中的城市已淪為森林﹐成為野生動物的天堂。

未日的時間再向前推進﹐經過數百年的風雨侵蝕﹐所有摩天大廈和人類引以自豪的地標建築物﹐逐一倒下化為塵土。諷刺是最後全下的人類建築物﹐竟然是在人類歷史上屹立最久的金字塔。我們自以為擁有最先進的建築科技﹐原來還及不上史前的石頭建築。沒有一樣建築物料比石頭長命﹐木材建築不用說﹐幾十年不打理已經倒塌。鋼根水泥建築耐久一些﹐但隨著鋼鐵生銹膨漲﹐水泥也難逃剝落崩壞的命運。至於其他能證明人類存在過的證據﹐不論是書本還是光碟﹐在沒有保養的環境下﹐幾十年便已化為一灘原材料﹐能夠留下來的文字記錄﹐只剩下幾千年前的石刻和壁畫。到了人類消失後一千年﹐地球上再也找不到人類曾經生活過的痕跡﹐自然生態也完全恢覆平衡﹐人類在地球歷史上彷如沒有存在過一樣。

看罷這套記錄片﹐有些人會感到人類何其渺少﹐面對大自然毫無抗抵的力量。也許有些人會聯想到環保方面﹐看到人類對大自然帶來的影響。我則認為這套記錄片的擔心其實有點多餘﹐人類何需關心人類消失後的世界﹐只要人類續繼生存下去﹐大自然根本沒法反抗人類的意志。既然大自然自我修愎的力量這樣強﹐人類也不用過份關心環保議題﹐就算人類真的不幸絕種﹐只要經過漫長的時間﹐大自然也可以回恢最初的狀態。只要環境問題不會導致人類絕種﹐保護環境只不過讓人類有舒適的生活空間﹐大自然本身可以不用理會。與其擔心環保問題﹐倒不如把時間精神﹐來研究人類生存的保障。我們根本不需要理會沒有人類的世界是如何﹐反正也不會關任何人的事﹐因為已經沒有人可以關事。雖說我們不必擔心未日後的事﹐這個節目還是滿足了我的求知慾﹐讓我上了一堂精彩的科學課﹐很值得一看。看資料性節目吸收新知識﹐總好過看無聊婆媽的無線劇集吧。

Son of Rambow 第二滴血

Son of Rambow 請大家不要誤會﹐《第二滴血》不是《第一滴血》的續集﹐雖然兩套電影也不是全無關係。《第二滴血》的故事發生在八十 年代的英國小鎮﹐有兩個男孩迷上了《第一滴血》﹐自行拍攝電影的續集﹐幻想自己是藍保的兒子﹐在槍林彈雨下勇救被敵方的俘擄藍保。拍攝的過程不單笑話連篇﹐還見證了兩個男孩的一段感人友情。這齣電影由英國獨立電影公司拍攝﹐有別於荷里活的公式喜戲﹐不會夾硬造作引人發笑。英式幽默比較含蓄﹐不會明顯地逗人哈哈大笑﹐但會讓人內心不禁莞爾。

這個故事是圍繞兩個小男孩之間的友誼。他們兩人的家庭背景﹐可說是完全兩個極端。一個男孩生長在清教徒家庭﹐每天除了需要讀聖經外﹐還嚴禁接觸世俗的娛樂﹐不可以看會教壞人的電視和電影。另一個男孩則完全無王管﹐父母在長時間在外國工作﹐與不良少年的哥哥相依為命。在一次遇然的機會下他們相遇﹐壞男孩給老師罰出走廊站﹐好男孩則因為不能看電視要出走廊自條。最初壞男孩是明搵好男孩笨﹐當他是下屬般呼喝使喚﹐好男孩還以為自己交了個新朋友。在壞男孩家中好男孩初次接觸電影﹐偷看在戲院盜錄的《第一滴血》後完全著迷﹐還幻想出藍保兒子救父的故事。壞男孩正想拍攝真人特技電影﹐於是便照好男孩的故事作劇本﹐哄騙好男孩當主角兼土法特技人。

他們兩個人每天一起拍攝電影﹐原本壞男孩只不過視好男孩為一件拍攝工具。直到有一次拍攝發生意外﹐好男孩掉下潮中機乎遇溺﹐壞男孩把好男孩救回上岸﹐他們二人的關係發生微妙的變化﹐壞男孩把好男孩視為朋友兄弟﹐開啟了他的心靈接納好男孩的友誼。在另一邊廂好男孩每天暪著母親拍電影﹐在他家庭的保守教會引起一個騷動。除了兩個小孩異想天開扮藍保拍戲這條主線外﹐這齣電影的支線也很豐富感人。有從法國來的潮爆交換生﹐介入兩人的電影拍攝﹐令他們的友情受到考驗。也有壞男孩與他哥哥的關係﹐好男孩母親與保守教會的關係﹐因為他們的這套電影而轍底改變。兩個小男孩因拍電影而引起的家庭問題﹐換一個角度去看﹐不也是與每個人成長的煩惱源出一轍嗎。

這套電影最成功的地方﹐是兩位童星的演技令人讚嘆服佩﹐把角色的感情﹐內心的矛盾爭扎演活了。在銀幕上好男孩前很天真單純﹐對每個朋友也是同樣付出真心。他一心只想拍攝自己喜愛的故事﹐不明白為什麼牧師要阻止他﹐說他在做壞事。他一邊不想讓媽媽不開心﹐一邊又兼顧與朋友一同完成電影的承諾。演壞男孩早熟得像一個小大人﹐可是老積外表下不時流靈出內裏一顆童真的心。他對好男孩態度轉變的表達技巧精妙﹐演活從欺負對像到真心朋友﹐因為誤會以為友情受到背叛﹐但在最後關頭還是不能捨棄朋友的心路。飾演配角的法國交換生也很入形入格﹐活脫像個受學生歡迎追捧﹐喜歡藝術愛自戀的反叛少年。

據說史泰龍十分欣賞這套 《第二滴血》﹐不過印象中這套電影好像沒有在戲院上過畫﹐甚至DVD也沒有什麼宣傳。我也只是坐長途飛機時﹐其他電影不是看過了便沒有趣興﹐幸運地隨意看到了這套電影﹐直是一個頗意外的驚喜。

100 pieces of paper to get before you die

I am reading the news about the author of the book “100 things to do before you die” has passed away.  The title of his book catch my eyes, so I went to amazon and check it out.  The book is about 100 places, festivals and events one should see in his life.  I am not a very cultural person, I am not interest in most of those events.  Why would I want to see some stupid festival in Africa or South America.  A few sports or fun events such as F1 racing or Nobel prize is quite attractive though.  Merely seeing things is meaningless unless you can get something out of the experience.  Most of those events will only contribute to your photo album and cocktail party chats.

Yet this books give me an idea.  Over our life time, we have to write exams, get license, acquire many pieces of paper that prove our existence.  I should write a book about “100 pieces of paper to get before you die”.  It should not be too hard to elaborate on each entry, talk about the benefits and justify the why you have to get it for a few pages.  That would make a nice little book.  Oh! Well! I can’t came up with 100 items, I can only think of half of them.  Here is my list (not in order) so far:

  1. Birth certificate
  2. High school diploma
  3. Bachelor degree
  4. Master degree
  5. Ph.D degree
  6. Grade certification of any musical instruction (paino, violin, etc.)
  7. Driver license
  8. Driver license for motor bike
  9. Private pilot license
  10. Sky diving license
  11. Paragliding license
  12. Hang gliding license
  13. Motor boat operator license
  14. Sailing certificate
  15. Yachting certificate
  16. Scuba diving license (PADI, etc)
  17. Any sport instructor license (Ski, snowboard, golfing, etc.)
  18. Marriage certificate
  19. Birth certificate of your children
  20. Passport
  21. Baptism certificate (or any spiritual certificate)
  22. Firearm license
  23. Hunting license
  24. Fishing license
  25. Any second language proficiency exam certificate
  26. Mensa membership
  27. Membership of any political party
  28. Professional designation or trade certificate
  29. PMP
  30. MBA
  31. Equity or bonds (stock certification)
  32. Any awarded scholarship
  33. Any sport award
  34. Credit card
  35. Library card
  36. DNA map
  37. Ticket of a cruise
  38. Ticket of a major sport event (World Cup, Olympic, etc)
  39. Ticket to outer space
  40. Will
  41. Toastmaster
  42. First aid certificate
  43. Life saving certificate
  44. Patent
  45. Property ownership
  46. Six Sigma
  47. Write a book
  48. Take a master piece of photo
  49. Any martial art belts (Karate, King Fu, etc)

Strictly speaking, you don’t get the last piece of paper before you die, you get it after you die – the death certificate.  Any suggestion to add to the list?