Votom Pailsen Files 裝甲騎兵 培盧杰文書

Votom Pailsen Files 竟然連續兩篇寫高橋良輔的影評 ﹐搞不好人家會以為我是他的影迷﹐其實不過剛巧最近看的動畫都是他拍吧。裝甲騎兵是八十年代機械人動畫的經典﹐劇中機械人戰狗寫實軍事化的設計和可愛的造型﹐為不少硬派科幻動畫迷津津樂道﹐是少數經得起時間考驗﹐足以名留史冊的殿堂級機械人。說起來慚愧﹐我那套裝甲騎兵的影碟﹐看了幾年還未看完。雖有故事和設定有口皆碑﹐但始終是幾十年前的作品﹐節奏緩慢偏又是五十多集的大長篇﹐結果看了一半便打入冷宮。

裝甲騎兵的名字是金漆招牌﹐每隔一段日子便會推出OVA作品。這次十二集OVA培盧杰文畫是前傳﹐講述主角奇利古在百年戰爭結束前﹐被徵調參加的特別實驗任務。沒有看過原作的人﹐看這套前傳會一頭霧水﹐不明白奇利古有什麼特別﹐為何會是打不死的完美戰士。不過這也不緊要﹐只看戰火連天的打仗場面﹐奇利古小隊總能化險為夷﹐絕處逢生的驚險遭遇﹐也已經值回票價。雖然機械人採用3D電腦繪畫﹐不論是配樂還是拍攝手法﹐這套動畫刻意保留八十年代的風格。用現代的眼光看或許有點老土﹐但對於我們老一輩的動畫迷很有親切感。像看一部翻新了的老爺車﹐你不要期望它有最先進的設備﹐但其閃亮亮的復古設計﹐另有一種特別的魅力和韻味。

雖說裝甲騎兵是真實系機械人動畫﹐ 但主角最重要的設定卻毫不真實。主角奇利古打不死﹐並不是因他特別出色﹐只不過是天生特別好運﹐他的基因是億中無一﹐不可能戰死的完美戰士。雖然完美戰士的理論完全違反常識﹐基因不可能影響控制生死的外在因素﹐姑且接受完美戰士存在的可能性﹐整個培盧杰實驗還是建立在錯誤的邏輯推理之上。故事中軍方司令部看中奇利古不死的專長﹐並糾集另外五個與他同樣生存機率出奇地高的士兵﹐組成一隊打不死的特別小隊。司令部不斷遺派不死小隊去送死的任務﹐說是要測試完美戰士的不死理論。小隊每次都奇蹟地生還﹐到最後司令認定不死小隊真是不會死﹐於是委派他們最終決戰中最關鍵的任務﹐認為不死小隊可以一戰定江山帶領軍隊勝利。可是司令部忘記了一點﹐不死不等於一定可以打贏。若司令部翻看以往的作戰記錄﹐不死小隊幾乎沒有打勝過仗﹐每次也是狠狽萬分地逃命。

看過正傳我們知道只有奇利古才是完美戰士﹐前傳結局自然是其他四位完美戰士候補要戰死沙場。 可是他們死相也太過難看﹐知道自已是不死的完美戰士後﹐真的以為自己不死盲目衡入敵陣﹐很理所當然地被打成蜜蜂巢。只有當自己是正常人的奇利古﹐一路也小心翼翼才可以保住性命。有時我也懷疑奇利古是不是這套前傳的主角﹐奇利古角色的性格沉默寡言﹐是不死小隊中最不起眼的人。在劇中奇利古對白不多沒有佔很多戲份﹐除了他名義是裝甲騎兵的正印主角﹐他基本上與咖厘啡小兵沒有分別。在正傳中他明明不知道自己完美戰士的身份﹐可是在前傳中他清楚知道自己是完美戰士﹐看來編劇前言不對後語﹐劇本上出了不連戲的小瑕疪。

這套動畫並不是拍攝給沒有看過的支持者看﹐八十年代的復古風格很難吸引現代觀眾﹐每集只有平均幾點的收視。大慨除了我們這些小時候看過裝甲騎兵的老人家﹐才會重溫一下新瓶舊酒的昔日光輝﹐

Old friend

Tonight I met an old friend, we haven’t seen each other for almost 20 years.  It is really wonderful that I am able to dine and chat with her after all these years.  I have dinner with two primary schoolmates tonight.  I keep in touch with one of them regularly but I haven’t seen the other since I graduated.  We spent lots of time catching up with each other, filling in the blanks on the past twenty years.

One good thing about talking to old friend is that they help you understand yourself.  They will tell you stories about yourself that you had long forgotten.  My friend remembers that I like to take the toys apart and put them back together when I am in school.  I guess there were traces that I will be an engineer when I am a little kid.  Another good thing about old friend is you can always make fun of their age.  Age is a woman’s secret.  But you know exactly how old your classmates are, you went to school together!

FLAG

FLAG 我一直以為自己是硬派科幻動畫的死忠影迷﹐我發現原來太硬有時我也會接受不了。FLAG是套非常認真的科幻軍事動畫﹐用模疑記錄片的手法拍攝﹐講求高度的迫真性﹐完全與時下買萌耍帥的風氣背道而馳。第一次看時我看了四集便中途放棄﹐可能是由於期望與現實的差落太大﹐加上在追看過份著重觀能激刺的高達和逆反﹐相對之下這套動畫便顯得如白開水般乏味了。第二次看有心理準備﹐不再以吃爆谷的心態看﹐才能夠靜心欣賞這套作品﹐在人物與故事世界之間立體細膩的描寫。

導演高橋良輔擅長拍攝現實軍事風格的動畫﹐ 他的成名作是裝甲騎兵。這次他在故事上四平八穩﹐主角是戰地記者白洲冴子﹐受聯合國委託採訪﹐記錄維和部隊的一項特別任務。破格之處在於實驗性的表達方法﹐整套動畫完全以記者的鏡頭線角拍攝﹐加插電腦螢幕畫面和保安攝錄機的片段。過場時刻意用電腦檔案載入的畫面﹐配合記錄片編輯的第一身鏡外旁白﹐觀眾彷彿看著編輯在整理冴子的採訪記錄。透過冴子拍攝下來的錄像﹐串連起貧窮國家內戰的慘烈情況﹐維和部隊軍人的理想抱負﹐還有作為故事主線的任務的始末。機械人是日本科幻動畫的必需品﹐這套動畫自有也不會例外。不過劇中的機械人非常真實﹐嚴格來說只是二足步行裝甲車﹐連當牽引劇情的工具也說不上﹐只不過部隊的其中一個裝備﹐與直升機機關槍的地位差不多﹐可以無視其存在的意義。故事中任務的詳情我不便透露﹐說穿了便沒有中間轉折的驚喜。不過觀眾可以放心﹐主線是很大路的戰爭電影故事﹐不會像上次餓沙羅鬼般結局神怪暴走。

若果說這動畫的主題是簡單的反戰﹐恐怕是侮辱了這套動畫。這作品涉及內容的深度﹐想表達的思想實在太豐富。透過動畫的影像﹐我們看到戰爭的殘酷﹐但亦同時展現落後國家人民淳樸的生活。在動蕩的亂世中﹐也有人過著日出而作﹐日入而息的游牧生活。彷彿在城市的戰事與他們沒有關係﹐形成一個很強列的對比。冴子在每次出動前後﹐也會訪問維和部隊的軍人﹐對戰爭對這個內亂國家的感想。他們在遠離家鄉的地方戰鬥﹐要抱著一份他可以改變﹐為當地人民的謀幸福的理想。動畫是從隨軍記者的角度去看整件事件﹐沒有俯瞰背景的完全整資料﹐觀眾只能從對話版段中﹐組織內亂的形勢和來龍去脈﹐好像在看電視伊拉克的新聞特輯一樣。到了最後一集任務成功後﹐觀眾才發現一直看著編輯的工作﹐竟然是整理冴子的遺物。這個結局的確很具震憾性。冴子在槍林彈雨中﹐跟隨著特動部隊出動採訪﹐跨越所有危險安全回來。想不到她的死亡完全反高潮﹐回國航機被恐怖份子炸毀﹐見證了人生的無常。

這套動畫不是每個人也適合看﹐不過若果你能耐心看完全套﹐你會發現這動畫引領你去思考很多人生和世界的問題。

Dropping standard

Every four moths, new co-op shows up in our company.  I don’t know whether is that I am getting old or it is really a fact.  I found that the standard of engineering students are getting worse and worse.

The first clue is the minimum grade in school to get a engineering school admission.  In the old days, you have to get over 90% in order to getting into the engineering school.  I heard that the admission average of engineering school is drop to 70% in the past few years.  It seems all the bright kids are flocked to study fiance and accounting.

The second clue comes in the computer knowledge of our co-ops students.  Newspaper says computer literancy is improving in Canada, but more people know how to use computer does mean they don’t how to use the computer better.  Many student only know how to use computer to surf the net, basic word processing and merely as a mean of communication and entertainment.  The general grow up with GUI seems totally clueless about the command prompt.  In the past, only those who loves into computer study computer, we know everything about the computer inside out.  Back then we don’t have computer classes, we just learn on our own by reading the manual.  Kids today are so used to spoon-fed computer knowledge, it seems reading the manual to learn has became a lost art.

The Art of Conflict Resolution

Last week I attend a training on conflict resolution at work. The instructor teach us a systematic way to resolve conflicts. In a conflict, there are two dimensions: relationship and personal goal. A successful conflict resolution should pay should build up relationship and achieve personal goal at the same time. Depending on different situations, there are five approaches to resolve conflicts:

Avoidance:
This approach is best for trivial conflict. However for bigger conflicts, simply avoiding the conflict won’t make it goes away.

Accommodation:
This approach sacrifice personal goal for relationship, trying to please everyone except yourself. In some situation asymmetric power balance, that is the one resolution. However, people always accommodate will eventually blow up.

Competition:
I think this is my default approach. The good thing is competition get things done, but it may hurt relationship. It is best use in the situation when you don’t care about the other person or the bonding of relationship is so strong that can withhold the competition.

Compromise:
Everyone give some and take some. It works on both relationship and personal goal at the same time, but it may end up everyone not getting what they really want.

Collaboration:
This suppose to be the best approach, everyone become a team, treat others goal as your own goal and find the win-win solution. Obviously, it is easier to say than done and it won’t work if there are mutually exclusive personal goal. On the other hand, if everyone is open and honest about his goal, it may turn out the goals are not so conflicting after all.