Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann 天元突破 紅蓮之眼

Tengen Toppa 零七年放送的動畫「天元突破」﹐可說是把超級機械人推向極限之作。Gainax自福音戰士以來﹐一直也是靠吃老本﹐沒有什麼特出的作單。今次「天元突破」終於吐氣揚眉﹐省靚招牌叫好叫座﹐甚至重拾當年一代經典Gunbuster的雄風。這套作品包含超級系所有王道元素﹐要幾熱血有幾熱血﹐狂派便當猛灑狗血﹐最具主角相最有人氣的角色﹐也可以未到一半就戰死沙場。打鬥跨張到超乎正常人的想像﹐由地球打到上宇宙打到入超空間﹐波士越打越強越巨型﹐連月球也可以拿來變身做超超超巨型機械人﹐總之看得開心過癮一味夠爽。劇中每戰也賭上全人類的命運﹐往往在最後關頭﹐憑著頑強的生存意志戰勝強大對手。讓人看得熱血沸驣﹐不禁為主角永不放棄的精神動容。不過看這動畫前先要把空想科學教室丟在一旁﹐千萬不要試圖把內容合理化﹐不然肯定會抓狂兼口吐白沬。

不要以為超級系動畫﹐就一定是公式化地每週一怪。 過份跨張違反常理的機械人﹐只不過是吸引觀眾的劇情道具﹐主線是很傳統主人翁的成長故事。說起來男主角西門從第一集對結局的成長經歷﹐很有古希臘史詩的文學風格﹐經歷了人生四個不同階段﹐最後找到了生命的意義。最初西門是典型弱氣男﹐仰慕強氣熱血的卡米拉﹐老是站在他身後當跟班。到卡米拉死後﹐西門立志要取代卡米拉﹐要完成他的遺願﹐凡事也會代入卡米拉的思考去考慮決定。到了打倒螺旋王後﹐西門當上新世界的元首﹐他慢慢走出卡米拉的陰影﹐開始找尋自己生存目標。到打上大空後﹐西門已經確定自己的方向﹐要為人類衡破未來無限的可能性﹐打倒局限人類發展的反螺旋族。

除了主角西門外﹐這動畫還有很多成功的角色。故事不到四分一就退場的第二男主角卡米拉 ﹐雖然熱血白痴到很煩人﹐但絕對是故事最重要的人物﹐他的性格決定了大紅蓮團日後發展方向﹐創造出一個連一個的打不死希望奇蹟。女主角優子非常萌﹐熱爆三點式配狙擊槍﹐可愛骷髏頭飾令她萌上萌。不過正如所有熱血動畫一樣﹐女主角一般都是大花瓶﹐或作刺激男主角爆氣的火藥引。優子在後半部有自己一集故事﹐已經算是戲份很多特別厚待。另一個女角西門女友妮婭﹐只有被壞人綁走扮公主喊救命的戲份﹐也不知算不算有當女主角的資格。戲中優子對卡米拉的愛情著默不多﹐她所愛的兩個男人也先後送死﹐優子的愛情運認真命苦。唯一美中不足是優子與西門的互動不夠﹐若果能描寫為葛城里美與碇真二的關係﹐西門的成長故事會更加完整。

只要故事舖排伏線得宜﹐熱血動畫也可以很深刻感人。當中最令我感動的情節﹐是優子從西門與卡米拉口中﹐分別聽到他們從前有被困在地底經歷的兩個版本。西門把能夠逃出生天﹐歸功卡米拉不斷鼓勵永不放棄的精神。反過來卡米拉很清楚自己只是得把口﹐他認定西門沉實堅持到底﹐才是能夠逃出生天的原因。西門一直在追隨卡米拉的腳步﹐原來卡米拉只不過是面鏡子﹐把西門內心的想法反映照出來。西門並不是真想成為卡米拉的替身﹐他只是用卡米拉為藉口作自己行事的源動力。後來西門在戰鬥中建立起自信心﹐領悟出力量其實源自內心﹐就不用再借助卡米拉的精神去支持自己的理念了。

「天元突破」也許跨張失實 ﹐但如果減去超級機械人﹐其實是很傳統正宗科幻小說的題材。外星人害怕人類進化的無限可能性﹐把人類囚禁在地球上﹐剝奪人類上太空的未來。正因為人類擁有進化的頑強生命力﹐基因變化適應環境﹐人類一次又一次挑戰衡出太空的禁忌。寧可當隻可以自由飛翔的鳥兒﹐也不要呆在地上委屈求存。動畫中所講的螺旋力量﹐其實比喻基因雙螺旋體DNA。最有趣是第二十三集﹐基佬科學家為大紅連團眾人用進化論講解螺旋力量﹐悶得全部人呵欠連天。不過他一換個角度去講﹐進化的力量就是求生意志與愛情﹐全部人立即精神百倍一點就明。

我一向不好超級系動畫﹐不過「天元突破」實在是太成功太好看﹐連我這個真實系支持者﹐也不禁豎起姆指大讚特讚﹐大慨沒有男生會不愛看這齣動畫吧。

Fido 疆屍人

Fido 在美國荷里活的陰影下﹐加拿大好像沒有什麼電影工業﹐印象中「疆屍人」是我第一套看的加拿大電影。這部電影是小成本的獨立製作﹐沒有特技沒有大場面﹐可是怪雞的風格卻別樹一格﹐是近期少數令我開懷大笑的電影。喪屍片恐怖片看過不少﹐疑似恐怖片的搞笑片也有很多﹐但這部電影卻是很另類的恐怖搞笑片﹐認真地探討喪屍與人類相處這個課題。正正因為電影拍得很認真﹐故事看起來更加充滿荒謬感﹐成為一齣黑色幽默的喜劇。

這部電影的故事很簡單﹐話說地球受到不明外太空光線侵襲﹐死人全部變成喪屍復活﹐四處出沒吞吃活人。幸好有喪屍公司的偉大發明﹐套在頸上馴服喪屍的頸圈﹐讓喪屍變為人類的好幫手。主人翁是個在小鎮生活的小男孩﹐在母親是個愛面子的是全職主婦﹐父親則是不懂表達感情的古老石山。居住地方行車道兩旁是花園平房﹐鄰居有常常剪草的怪叔叔﹐好管閒事的老婆婆。完全是平凡到無可再平凡﹐六十年代美國電視劇中典型的中產家庭畫面﹐只是日常起居生活中多了喪屍。

電影編劇最聰明的地方﹐就是拍出喪屍溶入正常生活的違和感。不論是喪屍笨手笨腳地做事﹐人類對喪屍見怪不怪的態度﹐不斷地沖擊觀眾對喪屍的既定觀念﹐顛覆電影常識來製造意想不到的喜劇效果。雖然電影中有很多喪屍吃人的場面﹐但完全不覺得恐怖反而很好笑。一來喪屍的化粧馬馬虎虎﹐只是演員把皮膚塗成灰色﹐喉頭呵呵聲怪叫張口就咬下去。二來變了劇中角色對喪屍食人也不當一回事。 好像喪屍失控食人像交通意外般平常。電影的趣味往往在細微之處﹐例如在葬禮時神父唸禱文﹐並不是我們平時熟識的版本﹐說寄望來世在天國復活﹐而是說塵歸塵土歸土﹐死者千萬不要復活。

故事主線講述小男孩與喪屍的友誼﹐小男孩他家中買了個新喪屍﹐喪屍的控制器出點毛病﹐喪屍失控殺了人。小男孩為保護喪屍撒個小謊﹐豈料謊言越滾越大﹐最後還引致喪屍暴動。故事中透過小男孩天真好奇的目光﹐質疑成人世界對喪屍的觀念﹐發問一連串讓人反省生命與死亡的問題。到底喪屍還有沒有生命﹖他們算是寵物﹐奴隸﹐還是朋友﹖喪屍食人是天性﹐那喪屍有沒有錯呢﹖死後要特別處理的葬禮保證不會變喪屍﹐還是寧可當喪屍也要勉強活著﹖若果親人變了喪屍﹐又應該如何與他們相處呢﹖電影沒有正面解答小男孩提出的問題﹐大人總是告訴小孩不用想太多﹐若果遇上喪屍失控食人﹐只拿槍出來打爆他們的頭就可以了。

「疆屍人」是套另類處境喜劇﹐由於片長關係﹐很多人物的描寫只是點到即止﹐故事還有很大發揮空間。 始終這套電影是笑片﹐喪屍也只存在於幻想世界中﹐不會有人認真去探討喪屍人權的問題。但電影中帶出來有關喪屍的反思﹐正好配合我這個blog的宗旨﹕輕鬆地看認真的問題﹐認真地去輕鬆作樂。

Firefox 3

Firefox 3

Firefox 3 is released today!  I have been a long time firefox fans, so naturally I downloaded the latest version at once.  The installation went very smoothly, it only took a few minutes.  Unlike the long and troublesome IE7 upgrade which took almost half an hour and rebooted my machine twice.  On the surface, Firefox 3 is almost identical to the older version, except a few minor cosmetic update.  Under the hook, it’s the new Gecko rendering engine.  Firefox 3 seems running a lot faster than Firefox 2.  However I don’t know it’s deal to the new engine or due to almost half of my add-ons are disabled for not compatible with the latest release.  According to the latest number, Firefox 3 has over 500 millions download and counting. If you are still using IE7, it’s about time to switch.  Come and join us in the bright side.  Why surf the net on a 2nd rated browser?

哲學功課﹕Nietzsche and Eternal Recurrence

今個學期讀存在主義﹐作為一個受現代主義啟蒙的理性人﹐對於這個哲學門派沒有什麼好感﹐甚至對其哲學思想也沒有多大興趣。只是讀哲學不同讀其他學科﹐就算不喜歡某哲學思想﹐也先要理解明白它的內容﹐才可以合理地否定其價值。

這門課的教授從事尼采的研究﹐尼采又是存在主義四大巨頭之一﹐所以課程前半部偏重尼采的思想。尼采最出位的言論﹐莫過於他高呼「上帝己死」﹐其他主要思想還包括超人慨念﹐無限復活﹐道德的起源等。他的文章寫得極含糊難明﹐與其他力求思想精練的哲學家不同。尼采的思想偶然也有值得參考的新觀點﹐不過大部份讀起來似是瘋言瘋語多點。其實尼采可能只是隨便亂寫﹐後世學者把自己的主觀意念讀入他的文章中﹐合力構建一代存在主義巨人。他的原文只有聊聊數語﹐那些學者卻可以寫出洋洋數萬字的論文﹐吹水唔抹嘴的順手拈來尼采補完計劃。

這篇功課是分析尼采的無限復活理論﹐因為尼采原本的理論沒有什麼合理根據﹐只不過是提倡某一種做處世的態度﹐基本上整篇功課水分極重﹐分別的只是有些觀點是前輩尼采學者亂吹出來﹐有些則是我昨夜趕功課臨時興起亂吹。題外話﹐李天命的機遇再生論﹐其實是抄尼采的無限復活論。

Nietzsche and Eternal Recurrence

In this essay, I am going to discuss Nietzsche’s idea of Eternal Recurrence and its implication in the meaning of life. Nietzsche proposed the idea of Eternal Recurrence that “This life as you now live it and have lived it, you will have to live once more and innumerable times more.” (GS 341) In some of his writing, Nietzsche asserted that Eternal Recurrence is “the most scientific of all possible hypotheses.” (GS p. 17) He assumed that time is infinite and our life is finite, according to the law of probability, the combinations of atoms that will recreate our life must recurrence again and again. As the latest development in cosmos science and quantum physics show that the space and time of universe is bounded and particles could have infinite number of quantum states, Nietzsche’s hypothesis is unsound. However this essay is not an inquiry into the scientific proof of Eternal Recurrence, we should treat Eternal Recurrence as a thought experiment to help us understand our life.

In the Christianity view of the world, life is linear in time. Man lived his time on earth, and then after he died, he will be judged by God. God will assign the man’s place in heaven or hell to have eternal happiness or eternal pain. In Nietzsche metaphysical system, God is dead; therefore there is no longer a God to judge the action of man. Many people are looking forward to the life after death. They endure the suffering in life and looking forward to the reward in the heaven. Taking away their God would render their life without purpose. They may think that the time on earth is finite and short, no matter what they do will not matter anymore after they die. As a result, they will suffer from the despair in a form of nihilism. In order to give some meaning to their lives, he proposed Eternal Recurrence as an alternative to fill the void left behind by God’s death.

According to Nietzsche, man should take the responsibility of morality into his own hand after God is dead. With an eternal recurrence of life, we must bear the result of every choice we make in our life. No matter the end result is happy or painful; we have to live through it again and again forever. Nietzsche thinks the idea of eternal recurrence would emphasis the importance of our decision and causes us “the greatest stress”, since we have to discern carefully about all our decisions and make sure the end result is the one we truly desire. For those people who enjoy every moment of life, who live with no regret, the eternal recurrence is a supreme elation. Their life is all they want. They do not need an external God to fulfill their life. In eternal recurrence, they would life to “crave nothing more fervently than this ultimate eternal confirmation and seal.” (GS 341) Nietzsche hoped this thought experiment would force us to examine our life, ask ourselves the question that “are we willing to live the same life again?” By answering this question, we will be able to internalize our desire and enjoy what life offers and become a “superman”. Once we achieve the state of “superman” by removing the concept of God, we can live our life in a new sea of possibilities, to explore all the new options and experience new growth potential.

Indeed the eternal recurrence may give us “the greatest weight” in choosing how to live our life, it seems that Nietzsche is too optimist about the human psychology and how a decision is make. In Nietzsche’s ideal scenario, the eternal recurrence would free the mind of man and let man live boldly and dangerously to have an exciting life. If man is rational and taking eternal recurrence very seriously, he may take every small detail into consideration before making the decision, then the outcome is very likely the exact opposite of what Nietzsche had suggested. On one hand, the eternal recurrence encourage man to pursuit his dreams by removing limitation imposed by Christian morality. On the other hand, the eternal recurrence also discourage man to take risk, since if he failed, he may have to live with the undesired outcome forever. Human mind tends to weight loses more than gains. If given a free choice, most people would pay safe and choose conservatively instead of roll the dice bravely and hope to win the jacket pot in life. When a man examines his life using eternal recurrence, it is very likely to find himself didn’t indulge enough in his desires or passions. He may regret not living his life to its fullest and “throw himself down and gnash his teeth” on the missed opportunities. However at the same time, he would also be glad that he had restrained himself or otherwise he could have failed miserably.

Nietzsche thinks those who affirm life would “jump in joy” for eternal recurrence, so they can repeat everything in their life eternally. Yet, Nietzsche did not foresee those who really affirm life would fill with the darkest despair for repeating the same routine life after life. According to the law of diminish return, more of the same life would bring less happiness and gradually lost its meaning after repeating itself too many times. A man may have lived a colorful and positive life, but he may not want to repeat the life again. For better or for worse, it is more fun to try something new in the next life. Nietzsche praises those who bravely sail in the new sea of possibility, yet eternal recurrence put a boundary on this new sea. The real “superman” would seek new adventure, sail in uncharted water like a voyager instead of going back and forth in same water body like a passenger ferry. The “superman” cannot bear the boredom of eternal recurrence, just like they cannot bear the boring life preparing for Christian’s judgment day. They escape from the cage of God, but they fall into another cage called eternal recurrence. The “strong” man need not seek the purpose of his life from a higher deity; he can create the meaning of his life by using eternal recurrence as a mental apparatus. The “stronger” man has no need to rely on such a mental apparatus; he could still assert the will of power even he can only live this life once. He would not look forward to more of the same life, which would eventually become boring. He would rather have an eternal resurrection than an eternal recurrence, so that he can come back to the world to experience a difference life by exploring the new possibilities. The meaning of life does not require an eternal repetition. If a life is meaningful, living it once already fulfill the purpose. If a life is meaningless at the first time, no matter how many times you repeat it, you cannot generate meaning from a void. There is nothing in eternal recurrence can’t be fulfill by living through it once and only once. The meaning of the second recurrence of the first life is redundant and hence meaningless.

In conclusion, Nietzsche’s eternal recurrence provides a new perspective to evaluate our life from traditional Christian life view. However Nietzsche failed to anticipate challenge from post-Christian morality. Eternal recurrence maybe a very powerful mental tool back in Nietzsche’s time, but today it looks pale in comparison and could not provide a satisfying answer to those who follow “the way of the stronger man”.