Dining with colleages

The good thing about business meal is that the meal is free. It is paid by the company. The bad thing about business meal is you eat with colleagues, and some of them are really picky on food. I was sent down to Santa Clara with an older guy from Mainland China. So when my local friends are busy, I am stucked with him. He taste is strictly Chinese, which I don’t really mind. However because he has diabetes, he cannot eat any sweet. He is so careful about his diet to the extend that he ensure the chef does not put sugar into the dishes. I guess with my allergy on shell fishes and egg, I shouldn’t blame him for his troublesome diet, since I am equally troublesome. Anyways, the food we can order is very limited. Despite the lack of choice, we came up with a very good menu tonight. We ordered steam rock cod, snow pea for main dishes and abalone for appetizer. I havn’t had such a satisfying meal for a long time. If I have to pay for the meal, I would order cheaper dishes.

I can understand picky on food out of health reason. It is a life and death matter, gota be serious. In the Santa Clara office, I am working with three Indians and they are all vegetarian. It is not fun eating with those guys. Selective diet base on religious reason is plain stupid. Why can’t religions update their out of date diet laws to be more civilized? Those diet laws are unscientific and unrational, left over from the dark ages. Yet, this is not the worst reason for selective diet, at least there is hope to enligthen them. I know some vegetarian stop eating meal because of humantarian reasons. They think eating animal are cruel. They are just a bunch of nuts! It is HUMANtarian, only applicable to human, not to animal. Animals are food for human, their have no right except being eat by us.

As long as we don’t eat the animals to extinct, so that the food chain won’t collapse, what is the problem of producing meat as cheaply as possible provided that it won’t affect our health? People in ancient time cannot afford eating meat all the time. Transforming from mostly vegatarian to a balanced meat and vegatable diet is a hugh progress for mankind. Turning back on meat and eating only vegatable is a step back in our civilization. Man can only be prosperous if we keep the progressive spirit. Say NO to vegatarian if you don’t want humankind lost its edge in natural selection, dethrone from the ruling seat of all living beings and an eventual extinction.

Lasalle reunion

I love travelling to the Bay Area.  I have a number of best friends from LSC living here.  When I come down here, I usual travel in a very short notice.  They break their daily routine and drive all the way to have dinner with me.  I feel reliefed and can talk without holding back with this group of friends.  We talk about all sorts of thing, any topic that we can think of.  That makes sitting through all those boring meeting for the whole week worthwhile.

After dinner, I have a long chat with my best friend.  He knows me really well, he senses my problems and try to give me some good advice.  Just like most people working in my company, my career is merely gliding.  Actually, the company itself is gliding.  I can’t find  my direction in life.  He is quite a different person than me.  His career goal is to become a VP or even a CEO and I think he will achive his goal, provided where he is right now.  To a certain extend, he don’t have to worry the same kind of mundane stuff in my consideration, so his choice is easier.  I want to blame my problem on the matter of luck, but I know I share part of the blame.  My friend gave me encouragement and motiviate me to take actions.  I feel more energetic and hopeful talking to him everytime.  Now, I just have to answer the question, what do I really want and start running.  Put it in another word, what is my meaning of life?

六月四日﹐吃小籠包﹐聽舊事

一九八九年﹐我讀中二﹐介乎懂事與還未懂事之間。當年六月四日的記憶﹐很大部份是長大以後﹐從每年六四的新聞片段中重組出來。我只是依稀記得﹐那個非常惡的鐵娘子班主任當眾落淚﹐向我們說些當年我們聽不明白的道理。父母好像也曾向我講解發生什麼事﹐不過正如其他的教訓一樣﹐全部左耳入右耳出﹐一句也沒有記住。家人也算是支持民運﹐買了個塑膠民主女神回來﹐也買那些不知那個報社出的六四特刊。結果民主女神變了我的玩具﹐民主女神大戰高達。至於那些六四書刊﹐大慨在移民時全部掉了。六四對於我﹐正如納萃集中營﹐南京大屠殺﹐盧旺達種族清洗﹐理性上清楚知道這些暴行應受遣責﹐全世界也要努力阻止再發生的人道災難。但感情上卻很抽離﹐這些事件只不過是歷史常識﹐讓我們以史為鑑的素材。幾個星期前﹐馬力埋沒良心否認六四﹐我也沒有什麼特別感覺﹐反正世界上白痴何其多﹐有人會否認猶太人集中營﹐也有人認為地球只有六千年歷史﹐有人否認六四﹐有什麼奇怪﹖大家起哄奚落嘲笑完這個傻仔﹐世界還是照樣運轉﹐我們的歷史不會有任何改變。

過去十八年的六四這天﹐我也是與其他平凡日子般度過﹐除了電視多了每年給我溫故知新的新聞外。今年的六四有點不平凡﹐我沒有參加任何晚會﹐只是在一間上海店中﹐邊吃水煮牛肉﹐邊聽著我同事細說當年。這兩個星期我給公司派了去開會﹐同行的還有一位同事﹐是九一年北大畢業的博士生。八九那年﹐他就在北京見證了歷史。本來同事間很少會說這些政治話題﹐兩個男人有朝到晚對足幾日﹐可以說的話題也說過了﹐我心血來潮央他說故事給我聽﹐其實那也不是什麼驚險的故事﹐不過與看新聞片段不同﹐聽著同事淡淡然說住事﹐別有一番感受。

我那位同事在民運期間﹐人家在天安門絕食抗議﹐他就趁不用上課﹐整正躲在宿舍打麻雀。六月三日他原本也打算去天安門趁熱鬧﹐不過朋友回來說天安門有人扔石﹐場面混亂於是就打消念頭。要不然﹐他今天也不可能和我吃鱔餬說故事。於對北京的人來說﹐六三才是屠城的日子﹐六四已經是事件結束。他如其他好奇的民眾一樣﹐六月四日往天安門看看﹐離遠只見兩排坦克﹐除了解放軍外什麼也看不到。

他自己沒有到天安門﹐他的朋友倒吃了軍隊的子彈﹐一槍兩洞前面入後面出。他說他的朋友很好彩﹐不是因為吃了子彈死不掉﹐而是混亂中沒然遺失北大的學生證。那晚很多人受傷﹐醫院沒有足夠資源救治所有傷者。醫生必須要作出取捨﹐救了一個人就有另一個會失救。他的朋友有機會及時得到治療﹐多得他是北大博士生的身份﹐性命比甚他閒人矜貴。我問同事﹐那天到底死了多少人。他說沒人知道﹐但他可以確定北大死了兩個同學﹐大慨校園內的消息比較靈通。我再問他後來怎樣﹐他說北京很快就回覆正常﹐人民照常上班上學﹐政府也扮作沒有事發生不再追究。只要沒有吃子彈沒有受傷﹐又不是上電視出風頭的學生﹐大部份學生都回校上課。吃了彈但沒死的學生﹐就畢業找工作出國扮簽證就麻煩些﹐要交代那個槍傷從何而來﹐當日身在何處。不過要過關也不太難﹐撒個小謊﹐找些有頭有面的人作擔保﹐總不會被當成民運份子關入監牢。他說現在沒有人會說六四﹐但北京每個人也記得當年發生的事情。他說著說著有點感嘆﹐說現在中國的貪污比八九那年更嚴重。他認識些有背景的舊同學﹐憑著政治關係營商已是億萬富翁。

六四這個很遙遠的名詞﹐今夜在小籠包與菜飯之間﹐與我的距離拉近了。

P.S. 貼了篇講六四的文章﹐希望我的網址不會給The Great Firewall of China過濾掉吧。

Flight to SFO

I am travelling to the Bay Area for a bussiness trip. I flied out on Sunday evening, so that we can rest a night before having endless meeting on Monday. When I waiting in line for the custom, I bump into an old friend of mine from university taking the same flight. I havn’t keep in touch with her for a few years, all I know is that she is living in Vancouver. We chatted and catch up with each other in the waiting room. She is finishing her Ph.D and moving down to the States with her boyfriend. I am joking that I can blackmail her by telling “stories” to her boyfriend, since I know this girl thru her ex-boyfriends. Two of my lab partners and a housemate of another lab partner went out with her back in Waterloo. What a small world.

I am flying with Air Canada this time. The airplane they use is an unfamiliar new model, E190 from Embraer. I always thought commercial airplane is dominated by the duonoploy of Boeing and Airbus. To my surprise, Embraer turns out to be a Brazilian company. I don’t expect a 3rd world country would have the complex technology of building an aircraft. The aircraft is pretty nice, each seat has its own entertainment system. I picked the movie “Children of Men” to watch, what a mistake. I didn’t realize the flight is too short for the movie. Even with the usual delay of circling over the Bay waiting for the runway, I am still 15 minutes short from finishing the movie. It is the first time I wish the plane will delay more, so that I don’t have to keep wondeirng what is the ending of the movie. I guess I have to wait till my flight back to finish off the movie.

Shrek the Third 史力加第三集

Shrek3 我也不記得上一次入戲院看電影是什麼時候﹐大慨已經是去年的事了。近幾年沒有什麼非要去戲院看不可的電影﹐非正又不急著一上演就去看﹐等出DVD或下載來看也不遲。今個暑假檔期上演的重頭戲﹐不是續集就是電視改篇﹐那些電影本身沒有很大的吸引力﹐都是那些可看可不看的平庸之作。不過久不久與女朋友去電影院﹐是指定的拍拖節目。在沒有更好的選擇下﹐我揀了至少有啖笑的史力加﹐也不想去看只有垃圾特技的蛛蜘俠或魔盜王。

史力加頭兩集我也有看﹐第一集玩轉童話故事有新意十分笑﹐第二集翻抄舊橋已經開始有點悶﹐不過還算保持水準。今次第三集還是在食老本﹐拍出來只有歡樂今宵趣劇級數的笑料﹐難免令觀眾有些失望。電影中的笑料仍然充份﹐不過大多數只是罐頭即食笑話。就像按觀眾的笑掣來引人發笑﹐但笑完後轉眼就忘記了。正如看見有人踢波給球打中下陰一樣﹐每次睇那些短片也必定會發笑。但這些笑話是很無聊﹐不會夠耐看。在第一二集那些笑話﹐表面看固然好笑﹐但要明白更深一層意思﹐才會更加好笑。要有腦轉數快才懂欣賞的笑話﹐才會叫人再三回味。

這集史力加的故事很單薄﹐公主的父皇死了﹐要史力加繼位當皇帝。可是生性疏懶的史力加不願受受皇位束縛﹐於是去外找尋另一個皇位的繼承人﹐公主的表弟亞瑟。上集的奸角英俊王子趁史加加不在﹐連同其他童話故事中的壞人﹐聯手攻佔童話王國﹐還把一眾童話公主禁固起來。史力加去到海外寄宿學校找到亞瑟﹐又哄又騙想盡辨法讓他來代替自己受罪。這個亞瑟是天生失敗者﹐是個連鬥心也沒有的和平主義者﹐更枉論要接手國王這份苦差。英俊王子佔了皇位的消息傳到史力加耳中﹐他便聯同一伙人立即回國救老婆。怎料史力加剛入城就被捉去﹐最後上演場美女救怪獸。故事是例牌的大團員結局﹐公主與史力加生了一竇仔女﹐眾人從此開開心心地生活﹐直到開拍第四集唯止。

今集那集令人煩厭的騾仔戲碼大減﹐不用再聽牠嘮嘮叼叼的扮搞笑。史力加和公主的笑料依舊﹐但熟口熟面沒有多大變化。倒是奸角英俊王子為觀眾帶來驚喜﹐他那幾場又要奸又要蠢的戲﹐讓人捧腹大笑。正如莎士比亞說過﹐喜劇就是發生在別人身上的悲戲﹐英俊王子越撞板越倒霉﹐觀眾笑聲就越大。戲中的四大童話公主也很反斗有趣﹐灰姑娘緊張時會不停刷地版﹐大慨是在後母家時遺留下來的習慣。長髮公主的原來是光頭﹐長過貞子的頭髮其實是假髮。睡公主患上渴睡症﹐會無時無刻忽然睡覺。白雪公主懂唱歌與動物跳舞﹐也懂唱歌命令動物攻擊敵人。這些笑料都很一貫史力加的風格﹐可惜戲中數量略嫌不足。

史力加好看之處就是玩轉童話故事﹐可惜今集的結局卻是老土的童話結局。英俊王子雖然是奸角﹐倒是戲中最正常的角色﹐放在一眾腦筋有問題的童話人物中間﹐才顯得特別搞笑。在上集指腹為婚的公主給怪獸搶去了﹐王位沒有了老婆也沒有了﹐今集生活潦倒要去賣藝。他沒有意志消尋﹐反而發奮要奪回失去的東西。他拯救在童話故事中給作者遺棄了的壞人們﹐領導他們反抗童話主角的迫壓﹐搞階級革命奪取政權。英俊王子的江山是自己打回來的﹐對比起史力加和亞瑟兩個不願做皇帝﹐把王位傳來傳去你推我讓的人﹐英俊王子管治在民間的認受性理應高很多。若果史力加能保持玩轉童話的傳統﹐就應該讓英俊王子當皇帝來作結局。其實英俊王子除了有點自戀外﹐他也不算很壞。若他是真正的壞人﹐一早殺了史力加和公主﹐就可以免除後患﹐但他就是下不了手。英俊王子手下那班壞人﹐除了相貌可怖嚇人外﹐也沒有欺凌平民百姓。英俊王子登基後懂得穩定民心﹐親自演出歌劇與民同樂﹐可見他會是一個勤政愛民的好皇帝。也許英俊王子是奸角﹐但不代表人民在他統治下不會幸福。三國演義的曹操是公認的奸人﹐但他同時也是治世之能臣﹐百姓在他統治下能豐衣足食。史加加和亞瑟沒錯是好人﹐但好人不等於是好的統治者﹐看看香港的董建華就知了。最初史力加以改革童話開出一片新天地﹐可是經過兩集的票房成功﹐由改革者收編為既得利益者﹐改革理念沒有薪火相傳﹐取而代之變成建制的一部份﹐共同維護童話世界的虛假謊言。史力加第三集不再是一齣反童話﹐只不過是一齣王子公主染了綠色的童話。